|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
PBS redbook compliance fee?
We have a program that a distributor to PBS is interested in - but they're saying we need to pay a fee to someone (?) for them to certify that our program complies with the PBS redbook standard.
Has anyone heard of this? I haven't been able to get any more info on exactly what is involved here?? thanks - Bob |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Newberg, Oregon
Posts: 494
|
Re: PBS redbook compliance fee?
I've never heard of having to pay someone to do this...but there is this link:
Program Guidelines & Policies : PBS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 951
|
Re: PBS redbook compliance fee?
Seems sketchy. Try checking into if the place is legit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: PBS redbook compliance fee?
Well either it is compliant or it is not. If not the program will be rejected. If it is something as simple as being a frame of two over, they might still accept it, but will charge the producers a production fee to fix.
You will also need to provide clearance and music cue sheets. Both audio and video must be compliant, and your Closed Captioning must be in sync with the programming. I think the distributor just wants to make sure they will not incur extra charges with this production or risk having it rejected. Are you delivering your show via HDCam Tape or HDCam Discs? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
Re: PBS redbook compliance fee?
it's not an HD program. the closed-captioning service is going to dub it to BetaSP.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,383
|
Re: PBS redbook compliance fee?
Quote:
National only accepted Beta sp as a screener copy, and stopped that back in 2012. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|