|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 11th, 2012, 11:54 PM | #16 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodinville, WA USA
Posts: 3,467
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
Quote:
But certainly what you've pointed out is valuable in terms of the original question -- can he use the shots he's already taken. But as this thread seems to have veered into having trouble from authorities when shooting Federal buildings, the copyright issues don't really apply in that case.
__________________
"It can only be attributable to human error... This sort of thing has cropped up before, and it has always been due to human error." |
|
March 12th, 2012, 12:05 AM | #17 |
Slash Rules!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,472
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
Question:
Define "public street." What I mean is. . .where does the public part begin/end? If you're in their parking lot, is that public or considered their property? |
March 12th, 2012, 07:48 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: London
Posts: 212
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
I conclude that people will get money from you wherever they can, and many in a position of power will wield it at any opportunity, especially if they are bored in their jobs and have a bit of power. Perhaps in this case, asking for permission is almost seeking hassle that could well be unnecessary unless you are shooting for a client who could potentially be liable in the unlikely event of any repercussions.
|
March 12th, 2012, 12:50 PM | #19 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 1,400
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
A street is obviously public. A parking lot is more often going to be private (unless it's a city-owned lot.) However, in reading up on this, I found a few of the laws and ruling referring to "publicly accessible spaces". That does not mean "publicly owned", but rather a location that is accessible to everyone at all times. In that case an open parking lot, while privately owned, is still considered a publicly accessible space.
|
March 14th, 2012, 03:13 PM | #20 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
Quote:
-Garrett |
|
March 15th, 2012, 05:28 AM | #21 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,742
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
Not necessarily. Some jurisdictions are selling off roads to private corporations who operate them as profit-making toll roads. Here in Toronto, our highway 407, stretching about 150 kilometers around the top of the Greater Toronto Area, is actually privately owned! Come to think of it, I wonder what effect that has on laws regarding photography along it or from it.
__________________
Good news, Cousins! This week's chocolate ration is 15 grams! |
March 15th, 2012, 04:09 PM | #22 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Novato, CA
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: Do you need permission to shoot a building externally?
Quote:
It does complicate things a bit for right of way issues but for the most part the same laws that govern public access have to be maintained as it is still public land and access rights need to be maintained by statute. However, in the US these types of arrangements are generally done for freeways which are controlled access roads (i.e. pedestrians and bicycles are not allowed on the road and stopping or your vehicle is only allowed in cases of emergencies) so it really doesn't matter. You can't stop and film from a freeway unless you get a permit anyway. -Garrett |
|
| ||||||
|
|