|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 21st, 2004, 05:37 PM | #1 | |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Is this true or false?
Quote:
|
|
April 21st, 2004, 11:49 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
I think I read that on the internet, so it must be true.
Actually, I think I read it on dpreview.com Also, the Digital Rebel is now BLACK!!! (a new black version will be shipped soon, anyway)
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
April 22nd, 2004, 01:24 AM | #3 |
Outer Circle
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hope, BC
Posts: 7,524
|
Yeah, I don't know why we get scre_ed from these companies. I posted a link at Area 51 with other examples regarding what we don't get here. Are consumers that stupid?
|
April 22nd, 2004, 11:37 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 199
|
hmm...black rebel....wow...awesome...
heh...i just sold my rebel...i got a 10d now! :)
__________________
John Garcia |
April 23rd, 2004, 04:16 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31
|
Seems like the 'Welcome Kit' version with Black Drebel, 18-55mm, 55-200mm is 148,000yen ~ 1340USD.
Add shipping, I'm guessing $150 ... under 1500USD total. Is the ultrasonicmotor lens that much better than the other one? Robert |
April 23rd, 2004, 06:57 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 199
|
wow...and now theyre throwing in a 55-200!
__________________
John Garcia |
April 24th, 2004, 05:08 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31
|
The regular 'lens kit' with the Drebel, 18-55mm seems to be 121,000 yen.
I've seen the US market sell the Drebel w/lens as low as $899 on the net. I'm wondering if the USM lens is worth the difference? Robert |
May 10th, 2004, 08:48 PM | #8 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
The USM motor is not that critical in a small lens like the 18-55mm. The 55-200mm is not so great a lens. Canon had tons left over from their APS SLR experiments.
The USM lens would be quieter and focus slightly faster. It would make a difference in a larger, heavier lens.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
May 11th, 2004, 06:41 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 31
|
Thanks. Your explanation makes me think that USM is nice but not worth the premium.
I haven't pulled the trigger on the Drebel nor the 10D. Kinda making the backordered muvo2 as my excuse to sit on the fence. Robert |
May 11th, 2004, 09:33 PM | #10 |
Warden
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 8,287
|
I've shot with both (own the 10D) and prefer the 10D. Image quality is the same, however. If you can live with the few limitations of the Digital Rebel, it would be my choice, on a cost basis. The 10D is a much better camera and worth the extra $$ if you're going to shoot much.
__________________
Jeff Donald Carpe Diem Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Where to Buy? From the best in the business: DVinfo.net sponsors |
May 11th, 2004, 11:33 PM | #11 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 932
|
Sorry I am asking this question for a friend and perhaps you guys can clear this up... which Canon digital still cam can share lenses with the XL1? You see he has one of those, his photo kit (Nikon) got recently stolen from his car and he wants to buy all Nikon again... but I think if he buys a Canon digicam he might be able to share lenses... so which camera should he buy that will allow him to share lenses easily among his video and photo cams?
__________________
Ignacio Rodríguez in the third world. @micronauta on Twitter. Main hardware: brain, eyes, hands. |
| ||||||
|
|