January 30th, 2007, 10:07 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 282
|
FS PRO SM1 Stabalizer
Has anyone used the FS PRO already? I'm about to purchase one and I'd like to read some opinions.
Price is around $2150, it is capable of supporting cameras up to 20 pounds or 9 kg and it looks well built. http://www.fsprostabilisateur.com/ |
January 31st, 2007, 02:41 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 318
|
In both the demo clips the operator's shoulder is visible a few times in don juan position. I wonder if that is from operator error or a design flaw?
__________________
Nick |
January 31st, 2007, 07:54 AM | #3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Quote:
That has nothing to do with the design; at least from your reasoning. If the person behind the camera is not a train operator you get the same mishap with any stabilizer. He just couldn't control the rig as it was slopping around on him. It seems to need a little fine tuning. Meaning the spring needs to be more relaxed from what I can see from the video. Then again, I could be wrong. You should also take a look at the running clip. It seems to handle the shocks pretty well. You do notice a little jitter in the beginning of the run but that could come from something else. Not too bad though.
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' Last edited by Charles King; February 1st, 2007 at 02:47 AM. |
|
February 1st, 2007, 12:35 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Interesting...I think they could use some better demos though. It's always a good idea if the stabilizer manufacturer uses the rig regularly or gets a professional to do the demo work. That way you can see how well your shots can look.
I have to say the switch was fairly well done though. Terry Indicam |
February 2nd, 2007, 11:41 PM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 13
|
Hello
Hi everybody!
I decided to leave the shoulder of the operator within the frame, We visualizes although the arm absorbs the movements well by seeing the shoulders gone from top to bottom, but it was not desired at the beginning, these two sequence were shot only one time, Thank you for your comments Frédéric Savard FS PRO |
February 3rd, 2007, 01:07 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Frédéric,
I've done the same thing in a few of my shots. One was at an outdoor wedding where I was leading the bride and her father across an open area to where the ceremony would be performed. That wide angle lens will get you every time if your don't watch out. Since then I have been very aware of the possibility of getting a shoulder in the shot so I work had to keep it out. My best to you and FS PRO, Terry Indicam |
February 3rd, 2007, 07:19 AM | #7 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 13
|
Hi Terry,
To be honest whit you a dont do this kind of mouvement often, but whit practice it is could be better. Other sbject: Your discreet vest was a very good idea! Good luck to whit the Indicam! Frédéric Savard FS PRO |
February 3rd, 2007, 08:05 AM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
Thank you all for your posts. |
|
February 3rd, 2007, 09:52 AM | #9 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 4
|
Hi people,
I have seen a third video where we follow a guy through a building to get a drink. Frederic you should put that up on the site. |
February 3rd, 2007, 10:32 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 282
|
Maybe Fredric needs authorization to put videos from others on his site...
|
February 3rd, 2007, 10:41 AM | #11 |
Tourist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 4
|
Diogo,
If I'm not mistaken the video I saw was at the same location as the "running" clip. |
February 3rd, 2007, 10:41 AM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 13
|
Hi,
Yes, probably soon, we make this shot to Spira Film in Québec city, Greeting! Frederic Savard |
February 9th, 2007, 02:37 AM | #13 |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: paris
Posts: 289
|
Interesting rig. . . I didn't know it before and until to read it there:
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread...571#post803571 It seems the Red buyers are looking for affordable solutions. And it seems this rig will be the best bang for the buck. 9 Kg / 20 lbs. . . Hmmmm. . . Or will the Indicam be on the indie race? That vertical arm tip seems an interesting feature. I agree. |
February 9th, 2007, 08:58 AM | #14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: brighon uk
Posts: 55
|
just to add to the appeal for any further user experiences/information with the fspro sm1 or earlier version. It looks an interesting prospect for the lightweight market.
Also if there are any views on the floatcam fc9 please, but not just based on pictures (i've seen some idiotic and really inaccurate condemnation in other forums based on pictures). I have tried this myself but dont rate my own opinion due to my inexperience so dont want to talk at length about it here...i will however say that despite the arms unusual appearance in pictures it is great in reality, build quality is top drawer, the gimbal seemed liquid smooth to me and everyone i saw trying it was deeply impressed especially given its price. |
February 9th, 2007, 12:13 PM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 282
|
Quote:
The Indicam will probably be on the indie race, but the FS doesn't cost much more and supports heavier cameras. |
|
| ||||||
|
|