|
|
|
|
|
January 15th, 2007, 11:15 PM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
Glidecam 2000 with FX1 and Bogen 501?
Hey, I recently picked up a Glidecam from another DVinfo'er and I've been having some difficulty getting a good balance with my FX1 with the big Sony battery in it. For those of you using this setup, what settings are you using? (How many plates, where, how far down did you place the bottom piece from the gimbal, ect.)
Also I have a 501 head and I've been looking for a quick-release plate that I can use the same quick release I have on my 501. The only one I've been able to find is a quick release plate for monopods. Any help would be greatly appreciated. (fortunately I don't have anything planned until like April I would want to use the Glidecam 2000 with, so I have some time to practice) |
|
|
|
January 18th, 2007, 09:08 PM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
Got it mostly stabilized now, just looking for a compatible release plate with bogen 501/503 heads if anyone has any ideas
|
|
|
|
|
January 18th, 2007, 09:23 PM
|
#4 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Charles, that looks like the plate which attaches to the camera. I think he wants the the other half (like the part on the tripod head) to attach to the glidecam.
This *might* be it... http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...goryNavigation |
|
|
|
|
January 18th, 2007, 09:33 PM
|
#5 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Gotcha, I thought that seemed to simple. Yes, that assembly will work according to the specs, and you get an extra plate with it!
Note that this sucker is not light when you are talking about handheld stabilizers--you'll have to extend your post and/or add weights to compensate.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
|
|
|
|
January 20th, 2007, 04:10 PM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
That might be it Boyd, I'll have to do some more research I guess. It looks about the same size as my current plate/head, but I've seen other ones that look about right, but not close enough to fit tightly. Maybe I should just contact Bogen/Manfrotto directly to get the answer I need
|
|
|
|
|
January 20th, 2007, 06:33 PM
|
#7 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
It does say in the description that it fits the 501/503 heads.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
|
|
|
|
January 20th, 2007, 09:30 PM
|
#8 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
Awesome, thanks guys I just wanted to make sure the same plates would work. I'm gonna order it tomorrow! Thanks again
|
|
|
|
|
January 24th, 2007, 05:30 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sugar Land, TX USA
Posts: 40
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 27th, 2007, 08:11 PM
|
#10 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sterling, Virginia
Posts: 226
|
Yeah I picked it up from a local shop, it works fine...now I just gotta find time to play around with getting it balanced quickly... lol
|
|
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2007, 12:43 AM
|
#11 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Noah,
You probably already know this but it might be helpful for anyone else reading this post. First get a good drop time balance (about 2 seconds) then go for the vertical front-to-back and side-to-side balance. On the Glidecam you either change how many weights you have on the bottom plate or lower the extendable post til you get the correct drop time. I'm embarassed to say that more than a few times in the past I have been guilty of trying to balance a camera on one of our systems and didn't do step 1. It's pretty hard to verticaly balance a rig when the camera doesn't want to stay on top. Practise, practise, practise Terry. Terry Indicam |
|
|
|
 |
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
