July 10th, 2012, 11:48 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Alan,
I think you did an excellent job on your review. Unless you are a gifted orator you had to do the voice-over a few times to get it correct. On a further note...what a shop! Tery Indicam - Indicam |
July 13th, 2012, 11:54 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 30
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Nope, not a gifted orator.... I had to retry recording every few seconds or so. The beauty of digital audio. You can mash many smalll clips into one apparently contiguous audio clip.
I love tools... the shop isn;'t as cool as it appear... anyone can have the same or better with a little patience and ebay or craigslist. |
August 4th, 2012, 11:00 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 506
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Does the handle on the Opetka have a hold in it so you could fly it with a steadicam or flycam arm and vest?
|
August 4th, 2012, 05:22 PM | #19 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 30
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Yes... the handle does have a hole in it.
|
August 24th, 2012, 04:32 PM | #20 |
Sponsor: CineForm
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 153
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Hi Alan,
Great review. Thanks for shaing. I've got a 7D and the 10-22mm Canon lens, but how would the Opteka work with the smaller Sony NEX-5N and 16mm lens? Would it handle something this light? |
August 24th, 2012, 05:20 PM | #21 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 30
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Never tried it with a small camera, but it should work.
Of course there must be a minimum weight limit, but I don't know what that would be. Maybe I will eventually try my wife tiny canon elph. |
August 24th, 2012, 05:48 PM | #22 |
Sponsor: CineForm
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 153
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Cool. Thanks again!
|
August 27th, 2012, 10:55 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 337
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Does it come with a quick release plate?. My understanding, you'll have to set it re balance it every time you put it down? Or once you got it dialed in your set if you use the same camera and lens. Ready to pick one up. Thanks!
__________________
Making Family Videos Not To Look Like Family Videos |
August 27th, 2012, 11:32 AM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 30
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
It is not a quick release plate.
Some folks have attached a quick release plate, but in my opinion that won't prevent the need to tweak the balance between shots. The balance remains consistent during a long continuous shot, but you will see minor shifts in balance after setting it down. Fortunately, you'll get enough practice readjusting the balance between shots, that it is very quick and easy (few seconds). I love to compare it with a Merlin2 but I can't afford one yet. I've heard that the Merlin is better, but you'll still have to tweak balance between shots. |
October 6th, 2012, 03:45 AM | #25 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Just got my Opteka steadyvid pro. After 2 hours of trying to balance this and still strangling, I am nearly there but I am getting a headache now....I know time is the magic word. I a a bit disappointing though that they haven't included a DVD to explain you (in details) how to go about it. You have to do this yourself ang Google.
stelios
__________________
My Blog: http://steliosc.blogspot.com "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am free" Nikos Kazantzakis |
October 23rd, 2012, 08:40 PM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 32
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
I wouldn't recommend this stabiliser to my worst enemy.
I received my Opteka Steadyvid last week and spent about 8 hours on Sunday trying to balance it! What a nightmare. I have quite a light camera, the Nex 5n, so I think this doesn't help. Finally, I got it balanced, however it continually needs minor adjustments and is always twisting to the right, even though I'm making sure that I'm always holding the handle straight. I purchased this for wedding cinematography, but I don't think its going to be usable as its too inconsistent. I wouldn't be recommending this unit to anyone, but maybe its better with a heavier camera, even though I have added weight to the top plate. I'm thinking about splashing out on the HD4000 which I'm hoping will be more reliable and easier to balance. Any comments on the twisting would be great. Rich |
October 23rd, 2012, 10:16 PM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Holly, MI
Posts: 30
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Based on my experience and feedback from others... I believe the decision is a balance between cost and patience.
I get great results with a heavier 7d and 10-22mm lens, but I would agree that you need patience and the balance must be tweaked often. If I had more money, I'd spend it on one of the many other nicer and more expensive alternatives. I stand by my opinion that there is nothing better in this price range. |
October 24th, 2012, 06:14 AM | #28 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS
Posts: 1,080
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Well after spending many many frustrated hours in trying to shoot "steady" shots with this unit I gave up. Money spent for nothing. The Active Steadyshot function of my NX5 is much, much better that this Opteka nightmare.Well can't always win.Are all the steady cams like this difficult?
stelios
__________________
My Blog: http://steliosc.blogspot.com "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am free" Nikos Kazantzakis Last edited by Stelios Christofides; October 24th, 2012 at 12:25 PM. |
October 28th, 2012, 01:19 PM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New Zealand, Rapaura (near Blenheim)
Posts: 434
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Sorry to hear you are having such a frustrating experience Stelios.
Out of interest, what particular features make the more expensive alternatives work better? Alan spoke about a problem with the gimbal in his initial video review, saying how the rig rotates one way or the other depending on which way you tilt the handle — you could almost call that a feature! Does the quality of the gimbal make or break a good design? Or what is it that makes the difference between a ‘joy to use’ and ‘hair pulling frustration’?
__________________
Stills at: www.flickr.com/photos/trevor-dennis/ |
October 28th, 2012, 05:18 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 204
|
Re: Opteka steadyvid pro steadicam review
Have you also considered the Blackbird? I got it to work with a NEX-5N and the pancake lens with ultra wide converter and it performed beautifully. And within no time I could configure it to work with my FS100. It has a great payload range. I can recommend it over the HD4000 and I believe the price is very similar.
|
| ||||||
|
|