September 28th, 2004, 08:32 AM | #16 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 143
|
Mine's finally shipped. I can't wait
__________________
Do more, learn more |
September 28th, 2004, 11:50 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: switzerland
Posts: 2,133
|
in reply to Charles Papert
No i do not have the "eagle from paris" because i got for years now a modified glidecam and do not afford to buy a 2nd stab. befor selling the first one. I think the back support and the arm are looking good enough to decide anybody who knows a bit about stab. to choose this one. |
September 28th, 2004, 08:02 PM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 226
|
good for you wesley.
giroud, is there an english site for this rig? i like the arm, very well made. ed |
September 28th, 2004, 10:24 PM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Alright Ed. I've managed to find a review on the L'aile stabilizer or the eagle stabilizer in english, which was done in french but I had it translated using Babel:
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...3D111&lp=fr_en
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
September 29th, 2004, 11:19 AM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 226
|
thanks charles.
ed |
September 29th, 2004, 11:53 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
No problem.
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
October 3rd, 2004, 11:45 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Ed,
(thank you for the comments. are you in the video production line too?) I have done a number of private long projects as well as weddings and music videos. I like the music videos best. I use an Indicam stabilization system which is for smaller to mid-sized cameras and found there is a problem when using it for weddings. The problem is when you are shooting with a steadycam system (spelled steadycam which is a generic name and not Steadicam for Tiffen's systems) it's hard not to upstage the bride and groom. It's too bad you can't be invisible as well as smooth. Did you find Magiqcam's web site? I have it at: http://www.magiqcam.com/products2.htm Hope this helps. Terry |
November 17th, 2004, 03:03 AM | #23 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
|
John's for real. He just takes a while to respond as he is very busy. I have my magiqam and it's really nice. I bought the original magicam at this site right here and john upgraded my sled for a VERY reasonable price. I bought the magicam originally for $1100 and I'm ticked silly with it. Sorry, you won't find that kind of a deal now. The new sled is a pleasure to balance and the gimbal is smooth as silk It's funny to see an arm for $6500 to look very similar to my magicam. Yes, I'm sure it's nicer, but I doubt it's $5400 nicer.
|
November 17th, 2004, 03:26 AM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Well Dave if you can be so kind as to share some pics. Saying it is okay but seeing is even more of a joy ;)
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
November 17th, 2004, 07:08 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: springfield, OH
Posts: 344
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Dave Stewart : John's for real. He just takes a while to respond as he is very busy. I have my magiqam and it's really nice. I bought the original magicam at this site right here and john upgraded my sled for a VERY reasonable price. I bought the magicam originally for $1100 and I'm ticked silly with it. Sorry, you won't find that kind of a deal now. The new sled is a pleasure to balance and the gimbal is smooth as silk It's funny to see an arm for $6500 to look very similar to my magicam. Yes, I'm sure it's nicer, but I doubt it's $5400 nicer. -->>>
I've seen pictures of the new gimbal, but it just looks more heavy-duty. What's the big deal about the new sled really? I'd just like to know in what way does it preform better. You said it's a pleasure to balance, I just don't understand how anything could be a pleasure to balance :)
__________________
Tony "Good taste is the enemy of creativity" - Picasso Blog: http://www.tonyhall.name |
November 17th, 2004, 09:53 AM | #26 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 226
|
hi tony,
where can we see the pics you mention? saw some new pics posted on ebay but the gimbal is similiar to the one i got as a replacement. only difference was its black in color, mine not. dave, how much did you paid for the new sled? ed |
November 17th, 2004, 12:08 PM | #27 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
|
The sled is lighter, powder coated, the bearings seem more smooth, but the most improved is the camera mount. It accepts a bogen tripod plate which allows for easy removal of the camera, plus easy front-back balancing. Also, side to side balancing is more refined, easy, and secure. My camera would come loose with the old mount. Also, you couldn't balance the camera properly and had to swing the weights at the bottom to achieve balance which I understand is a no no.
|
November 17th, 2004, 12:34 PM | #28 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 795
|
Nice to hear Dave but don't you have any pics to share, man?
__________________
Charles 'What we perceive to be may not be what we believe to be.' |
November 17th, 2004, 08:29 PM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 226
|
totally agree with charles. we want picture 8)
ed |
November 17th, 2004, 10:05 PM | #30 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 109
|
Ok. I had to drag it out of the closet. Take it out of the case. Take pics. And try fo remember how to set up my ftp program, remember passwords, upload etc. to get this to you. I how you appreciate it.
Dave http://www.awesomedental.com/images/sled%20images/ |
| ||||||
|
|