February 26th, 2009, 08:44 PM | #31 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 318
|
The 2 quick release plates weigh in at 290 grams, and you still need those weights at the bottom for increased stability. In my case my light needs to be powered by the large F970 battery. As a one off I could put up without the convenience of a qr plate, but not every week. Unfortunately I have very limited time to set up most times. Of course every body's situation is different, but just sharing my experience.
__________________
Nick |
February 27th, 2009, 06:50 AM | #32 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,498
|
Quote:
Glidecam HD-4000 and x10 Test on Vimeo |
|
February 27th, 2009, 07:02 AM | #33 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
|
February 27th, 2009, 07:12 AM | #34 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 318
|
C'mon Dave it's a perfect excuse for buying a new rig. -)
__________________
Nick |
February 27th, 2009, 11:17 AM | #35 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
I'm still trying to decide on which to go with for my pilot.. to go with an EX1 would probably give me more leeway.. though I'd really like to see some photos and footage of a user successfully flying with the EX3.. it's nice to read about some users experiences.. but seeing is believing.. I would imagine it's much harder to get dynamic balance correctly with the EX3 due to it's fixed monitor position.. am I wrong?
Also sorry to hijack this post with another message but can anyone recommend a good quick release plate? I could really be doing with one.. |
February 27th, 2009, 11:50 AM | #36 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 643
|
Quote:
Manfrotto by Bogen Imaging | 577 Quick Release Adapter | 577 |
|
February 27th, 2009, 01:36 PM | #37 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
Images below.
|
February 28th, 2009, 05:01 AM | #38 |
New Boot
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Thanks Randy for the reply..
Also Dave thank you so much for posting them images.. it helps me to visually get a better understanding the whole rig + accessories.. what was the total combined weight? that would pretty much be all I would need to fly with regarding accessories.. and your powering the camera from the rig right? also what shotgun are you using there? and did you achieve dynamic balance ok? Sorry if i'm repeating questions.. I just want to be sure I make the right choice with camera.. Thanks Cathal |
February 28th, 2009, 07:26 PM | #39 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
With these accessories, it's right at the limit. I had to crank the blue thumbscrews all the way up to get the Pilot arm level.
Yes, using a custom cable with 2.1mm and Sony EIAJ DC right angle connectors. Note that the yellow Sony EIAJ DC plug really needs to be right angle so it doesn't hit your left cheek. I chopped that connector off the end of this cable. Vortex Media: VIDEO & PHOTO Tools and Training Note that the composite video out BNC connector is also right angle for the same reason. Rode NTG-1 shotgun, Rode SM-3 shock mount, Rode Dead Cat windscreen, Custom cable with Neutrik NC3MRX-B & NC3FRX-B connectors. Yes, dynamic balance was good. The tripod mount had to go one hole back, so it hangs off the back a little (see pictures). I also had to do this with the Sony EX1 and Z1U cameras to get dynamic balance. Last edited by Dave Gish; March 1st, 2009 at 09:49 AM. |
February 28th, 2009, 09:29 PM | #40 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 418
|
Quote:
Really need to also make a power cable for my EX1, with the camera, big battery and a big lectrosonic receiver (http://www.lectrosonics.com/wireless/400/ucr401.htm) it definitely feels like its at its maximum weight. My arm starts to sag after that.. But then you go and post pics of an EX3 rig which im sure must way more than what im flying.. no battery there though, i can definitely see how thats going to help. |
|
February 28th, 2009, 10:22 PM | #41 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: KLD, South Africa
Posts: 983
|
Go for the Steadicam, I have the Smooth Shooter, the X-10 is a Smooth Shooter with an extra arm, I don't like my Smooth Shooter very much! It's great for cheap events however when you start going professional it's no good. The Glidecam 4000 Pro has quite a few design flaws that make it impossible to recommend, the gimbal handle is fixed and placed in a stupid place, the gimbal on the Steadicam can be moved up and down. When I try to get certain angles the gimbal on the Glidecam makes contact with the plate holding the camera, it's very annoying and a deal killer. You need an external monitor for good flying, the Steadicam has one standard as it should be. The Glidecam is only useful on a flat surface, when moving over rocky, bumpy terrain forget about smooth motion.
As soon as I can afford it, I'm selling my Glidecam for a Steadicam. |
| ||||||
|
|