January 16th, 2008, 12:33 PM | #1 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 19
|
Questions about steadicam and mic cable
Hello,
I'm looking into getting a Merlin or Glidecam and was wondering how will it work with a mic cable connected directly to my camera (DVX100A). Will I be able to move around and still have that same steadicam smoothness or will the mic cable ruin it? I don't have a separate audio mixer for the boom mic to plug into -- I don't have too much money. Thanks. |
January 16th, 2008, 12:50 PM | #2 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
With the lighter rigs a cable will indeed "ruin it" for most users--the delicate touch that is required must be beefed up to compensate for the inflexibility of an audio cable and the operating suffers.
You would need more than an outboard mixer, you'd need a separate recorder, which could be another camcorder (even a very inexpensive one) to do this best. It's not to say that you simply cannot run with a cable, it runs from less-than-ideal to deal-breaker. The more novice one is as an operator, the more of an issue it will be.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
January 16th, 2008, 01:09 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 19
|
Thank you for the quick reply. Hmmm, Guess I'll have to think of an alternative. But that idea of using another inexpensive camera to record audio sounds plausible. Might consider that if I decide to go with the steadicam route, thank you!
|
January 16th, 2008, 05:29 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Posts: 624
|
And of course the other option is to use a radio-mic (or a wirless audio link if you have an outboard mixer).
- Mikko
__________________
Mikko Wilson - Steadicam Owner / Operator - Juneau, Alaska, USA +1 (907) 321-8387 - mikkowilson@hotmail.com - www.mikkowilson.com |
January 17th, 2008, 01:40 AM | #5 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 19
|
Yes that's another good option, but it's too costly for me right now. I'll consider that when my financial status is better. Thanks
|
January 20th, 2008, 12:39 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auburn, CA
Posts: 578
|
Somnang,
The only way that I have found for me to shoot with an external mic (which I didn't know about in advance) was to balance the sled a bit bottom heavy and use my control hand to help keep the post vertical on moves i.e. acceleration or direction changes. It's not easy but when you have no other options it works better than nothing. Charles and Mikko have excellent suggestions. You can also get a high quality solid state recorder and use it with a boom mic or wireless system. I bought a Zoom recorder and it has been a very nice piece of equipment to own. Tery Indicam |
February 6th, 2008, 11:57 PM | #7 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
The only problem I’ve read on some other forums (can’t remember now where I surfed) is that the H4 didn’t sync well for longer duration shots (more than a couple of minutes). Have you had this problem, or is this just smoke? Also, even if things sync up nicely, it seems like a hassle to have to manually line things up in post. If you have lots of shots, just trying to figure out what sound goes with each shot could be a challenge. So I started looking at wireless options, but then I read some horror stories about drop-outs and noise in non-ideal conditions. Lectrosonics seems to get around most of that, but their price is steep ($1K and up). So here’s what I’m thinking at the moment: Use both the Zoom H4 and a less expensive wireless system (e.g. Sennheiser G2 100 for $500). If the wireless sounds good for a given shot, then use that. That’s the easiest. If the wireless doesn’t sound good on a given shot, then download the H4 sound through USB and then use the wireless sound as a reference to sync it up. Many wireless lavaliere transmitters also accept a line level as an input. The Zoom H4 line out mirrors what it is recording. So all you need is a short 1/8” male to male cable. You end up with a phantom powered XLR input going trough a wireless lavaliere transmitter receiver as well as being stored to flash memory locally, all for $800 total ($300 for the Zoom and $500 for the Sennheiser). Any thoughts? |
|
February 7th, 2008, 01:23 AM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverdale, NJ
Posts: 468
|
Zoom H4 sync problem update:
It looks like this may be limited to recorders with old firmware. See here for details: http://createdigitalmusic.com/2007/0...ie-production/ The post on December 29, 2007 claims only 5 frames drift after 30 minutes using the latest firmware. Latest firmware available here: http://www.zoom.co.jp/english/download/software/h4.php |
February 7th, 2008, 02:05 AM | #9 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Regarding syncing sound to clips; luckily that solution has been around for 80 years or so, just use a slate with clapper (and call out the scene and take numbers)!
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
February 7th, 2008, 02:39 AM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
|
I think the syncing problem with the zoom has been that it doesn't run at the standard rate, so even though it's synced at the start of the video in the NLE, after the audio runs awhile it will be out of synch.
According to the post above, new firmware may fix this problem. |
| ||||||
|
|