|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 10th, 2016, 03:07 AM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 241
|
Re: Owners, would you still buy a FS5?
Thanks Ryan, that's uesful. Can I ask how you get on with the lack of VR on your Nikon lenses that have it? I'm asking because I've become very used to the excellent image stabilisation on my Canon XF300, particularly for capturing handheld at a distance. I would use my Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 VR on the FS5 to achieve the same, but obviously I won't have VR?
Something else I'm wondering about is the weight of that particular lens hanging on the front of the mount. As you know it's a very heavy lens and I'm concerned that over time it will weaken the mount. |
February 10th, 2016, 12:36 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Re: Owners, would you still buy a FS5?
Quote:
The Tokina really is a lovely wide lens and very affordable. Heavy, yes, but I've used it for a few years on a VG10 (as a B camera to the EX1) for the occasional wide shot. A really lovely wide lens that I tend to use at the 11mm setting. Looking forward to using it with the FS5. The Nikon 50mm is the other one of these I have. Very cheap to own yet extremely fast. So cheap that you can justify the cost even if you only use it a few times a year. Would recommend both. I only use them on sticks so lack of stabilisation not a concern. The 50mm on a slider can get you some lovely product shots.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
|
| ||||||
|
|