Data for S-log correction at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony Digital Cinema Camera Systems > Sony XDCAM PMW-F3 CineAlta
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Sony XDCAM PMW-F3 CineAlta
HD recording with a Super35 CMOS Sensor.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 4th, 2012, 01:11 AM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Drachten, Netherlands
Posts: 179
Data for S-log correction

I'm using a Transvideo CineMonitor Evolution SBL8 monitor, Really great tool!
The screen has a tool which provides curves for log C, log F and Panalog. I asked Transvideo to provide S-log correction for viewable (rec 709ish) in these presets. They are very helpful and are willing to implement this. I was asked if I have the 'S-log description'. Does anybody know what this is? I assume some values to work out in a gamma formula.
Can some provide the correct data or a place where I can find this? In the attachment what the manual says about curves.
Maybe Allister?

Thanks a lot
Attached Thumbnails
Data for S-log correction-sbl8curves.jpg  
Ron Aerts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 4th, 2012, 09:22 AM   #2
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,100
Re: Data for S-log correction

Sony has a white paper they released a little while back:

The formula describing the slope is in there for sure.

http://pro.sony.com/bbsccms/assets/f...log_manual.pdf

While they're at it, they should do S-Log 2 as well, but I haven't seen a white paper for that yet.
__________________
My Work: nateweaver.net
Nate Weaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 4th, 2012, 11:13 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Drachten, Netherlands
Posts: 179
Re: Data for S-log correction

thanks Nate, I forwarded it to Transvideo. I hope it works out.
Ron Aerts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 08:22 AM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Posts: 479
Re: Data for S-log correction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate Weaver View Post
Sony has a white paper they released a little while back:

The formula describing the slope is in there for sure.

http://pro.sony.com/bbsccms/assets/f...log_manual.pdf

While they're at it, they should do S-Log 2 as well, but I haven't seen a white paper for that yet.
They never published one for the F3 that I know about. The one that Nate posted is for the F35.
__________________
Douglas Villalba - director/cinematographer/editor
Miami, Florida, USA - www.DVtvPRODUCTIONS.com
Douglas Villalba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 09:14 AM   #5
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Re: Data for S-log correction

Doesn't matter whether it's for the F3, F35, F55 etc. It's the same curve for all cameras, so the same corrections would be applied. Arri Log C is so close to Sony S-log that for general monitoring and viewing applications Log C would work fine.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 10:53 AM   #6
New Boot
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 10
Re: Data for S-log correction

To Allister's point. I just recently loaded some "de-logging" LUT's in to Resolve Lite that Andy Shipsides posted on the Abel blog. He had made replica 3D luts for S-Log like the ones that come in the camera (after upgrade). Most had a very subtle look/change except for the SLog to 709 LUT that instantly clipped highlights. Not Andy's fault, that LUT in camera does the same thing. For the fun of it I tried the Arri Log-C to 709 LUT and it was very close to perfect. Had to increase exposure and de-saturate a little but it gave me a great starting point. I've never done it but for rough monitoring on set I'd assume the Log-C lut with a little monitor adjustment would work ok.
Bill Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5th, 2012, 01:04 PM   #7
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Re: Data for S-log correction

There is a big difference between a viewing LUT that converts S-log to 709 or similar to having the correct gamma curve in the monitor. A viewing LUT takes the full log range and converts it to a different range such as 709 or another gamma compatible with most conventional monitors (which if they are HD will most likely be Rec-709). As 709 can not correctly display the full tonal range of S-Log, then something has to go. Often highlights are clipped or crushed or contrast is reduced. So the LUT adjusted video will never truly represent what the camera is shooting. If you have a monitor with alternative gammas, then the monitor can skip the Rec-709 gamma curve altogether and directly convert the S-Log input to the on screen view. This is much better and more accurate than having to go in to the monitor via a restricted range gamma like 709. However for the very best results you need an OLED monitor to show the full dynamic range of the camera.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2012, 07:56 AM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 74
Re: Data for S-log correction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alister Chapman View Post
Doesn't matter whether it's for the F3, F35, F55 etc. It's the same curve for all cameras, so the same corrections would be applied. Arri Log C is so close to Sony S-log that for general monitoring and viewing applications Log C would work fine.
No its not all the same curve. The new F's have S-Log 2, which is different from S-Log. The S-Log2 Gamma Curve was designed specifically for the extended dynamic range to support full Sony F65 latitude at 1300%, and now they expanded to the F5 and F55.
__________________
Richard Allen Crook
www.crookedpathfilms.com
Richard Crook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2012, 10:46 AM   #9
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Re: Data for S-log correction

S-Log2 is a different curve, but S-Log is S-Log no matter which camera and the curve data for S-Log will be the same for all cameras and what the OP is after is the curve data for S-Log, not S-Log2. Admittedly I shouldn't have included the F55 in may camera list, although it is possible that you will have the option for both S-Log and S-log2.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2012, 12:08 PM   #10
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Drachten, Netherlands
Posts: 179
Re: Data for S-log correction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alister Chapman View Post
If you have a monitor with alternative gammas, then the monitor can skip the Rec-709 gamma curve altogether and directly convert the S-Log input to the on screen view. This is much better and more accurate than having to go in to the monitor via a restricted range gamma like 709. However for the very best results you need an OLED monitor to show the full dynamic range of the camera.
Am I right here?:
The Transvideo monitor has a great measuring tool for exposure. I think it is important not to use the SDI mon output as it can show the converted lut and therefore give inaccurate information. I use the SDI through on the outboard recorder connected to the A and/or B output of the F3, Then I know for sure to measure exposure on the right levels.
I use the measuring tool on the F3 a lot. Is the measuring still correct when one of the LUT's is chosen? I didn't experiment on that yet
Ron Aerts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 9th, 2012, 05:16 PM   #11
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: melb.vic.au
Posts: 447
Re: Data for S-log correction

Middle grey in Slog is 38%, Slog2 it's 32.3%. A different LUT is needed.
__________________
www.davidwilliams.com.au
David C. Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 10th, 2012, 02:13 AM   #12
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Re: Data for S-log correction

The F3 centre spot meter or histogram etc is only correct when no LUT is selected. The Transvideo tools should remain accurate when you use the Log C gamma curve as the monitor is measuring the input level, provided you are measuring the cameras clean output, ie no LUT applied in camera.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 13th, 2012, 10:10 PM   #13
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Drachten, Netherlands
Posts: 179
Re: Data for S-log correction

Maybe it would be better to let the spotmeter/histogram always measure the sensor value when S-log is on...
Ron Aerts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2012, 11:50 AM   #14
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Re: Data for S-log correction

I agree that it would be better for the center spot meter to read sensor values as opposed to post gamma correction values. If you are using the HG LUTs then the last two digits of the LUT name tells you where mid grey should be. So if you select HG8009G40 you should have middle grey at 40 when using the centre spot meter while the LUT is enabled.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 24th, 2012, 02:31 PM   #15
Trustee
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
Re: Data for S-log correction

"So if you select HG8009G40 you should have middle grey at 40 when using the centre spot meter while the LUT is enabled."

That is extremely close to 38% is it not? Pretty much as close as I ever get with that center meter anyway. Am I guessing right that other levels like flesh tone would be further off the mark.
Leonard Levy is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony Digital Cinema Camera Systems > Sony XDCAM PMW-F3 CineAlta


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network