|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 2nd, 2012, 09:43 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 54
|
F3 spot shot in California
Here is a spot we shot using the F3. Shot using both onboard SxS and to a PIX240. Zeiss C.P's were used. The interview was shot at 1080/30p. The b-roll was all shot at 720p 30/60 overcrank.
Aurora St. Luke's "Carl" 2012 - YouTube |
|
|
|
February 2nd, 2012, 11:54 AM
|
#2 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Weehawken New Jersey
Posts: 210
|
Re: F3 spot shot in California
Very nice! Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2012, 07:26 AM
|
#3 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Posts: 22
|
Re: F3 spot shot in California
Looks great! Very nice saturation and contrast. I like the composition of the interview with the arches in the background, sun streaming across the tiles, and shadows breaking up the splash of sunlight.
|
|
|
|
|
February 3rd, 2012, 12:54 PM
|
#4 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 256
|
Re: F3 spot shot in California
Thanks for posting. Did you end up using the SXS card files or the PIX files? Was there a big enough difference?
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
February 6th, 2012, 08:22 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 54
|
Re: F3 spot shot in California
Used footage from the PIX. It held up a bit better in color grading. We also did a lot of work replacing the sky in the background of a couple shots, so the 10bit footage held up better for that.
As for the footage side by side, not much difference. But once you blew it up and started working with it there was a difference. |
|
|
|
|
February 6th, 2012, 09:02 AM
|
#6 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 256
|
Re: F3 spot shot in California
Thanks Gregory. Makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
