|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 8th, 2012, 08:53 PM | #31 |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,450
|
Re: S-log and outputs
Charles, not a bad idea, although I'd have to see it in action before I'd settle for the image quality of an ENG/EFP lens. I never realized how poor those $25K lenses really looked until I switched over to PL lenses. One of the best things about moving to a S-35 sensor is not having to use those lenses anymore. But with that said, maybe Alister's 2/3" adapter is what we'd want to use on my hypothetical PDW-F800PL for run & gun.
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
January 9th, 2012, 01:53 AM | #32 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6,810
|
Re: S-log and outputs
There's those cine-style zooms like the Zeiss Digizoom that floated around when the F900 was king--but not quite as ideal for run and gun. Still a greatly improved zoom ratio over the handholdable PL zooms (and faster, to boot).
We did manage to work the Alura 18-80 into a handholdable setup with the F3, but it's a little strange configuring a camera when the center of gravity is fore of the lens port. However I expect to see more and more of this as the cameras shrink as the optics stay the same size.
__________________
Charles Papert www.charlespapert.com |
| ||||||
|
|