|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 27th, 2011, 05:46 AM | #46 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, UK
Posts: 231
|
Re: Sony Kit lenses vs still or Red lenses?
The Vimeo camparison was fascinating, thanks for linking.
Out of interest, the Sony lenses are made for Sony by Konica Minolta, the Zeiss CP2 primes are apparently manufactured by Cosina, so no longer 'German glass'. Extremely interesting to see the different colour rendition and contrast between them. I'm looking forward to see Cooke added into the comparison mix too.
__________________
Nick Wilcox-Brown, Film-maker and Photographer https://nickwb.com https://wildphotographer.co.uk |
March 27th, 2011, 09:31 AM | #47 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Re: Sony Kit lenses vs still or Red lenses?
I have heard similar information about the Sony lenses being manufactured by Konica Minolta but I have never heard it qualified by a Sony Production Manager or Marketing Rep.
To my eyes and hands those lenses have the same look and feel as Fujinon lenses. Also Sony has a very close and long standing relationship with Fujinon but this is all conjecture. Regardless, I would want to hear from a well placed Sony representative before stating where these lenses actually came from. |
March 27th, 2011, 01:11 PM | #48 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 98
|
Re: Sony Kit lenses vs still or Red lenses?
Actually Sony bought the Photo Imaging Unit from Konica Minolta 5 years ago.
cheers Morton |
March 28th, 2011, 12:09 AM | #49 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 120
|
Re: Sony Kit lenses vs still or Red lenses?
Quote:
__________________
Director of Photography - www.timurcivan.com Sony F3, Cooke lenses, sunny disposition. |
|
| ||||||
|
|