|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 22nd, 2010, 05:46 PM | #16 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
That said, I think you're right - it may not be perfect, but what else is there that's better ? |
|
November 22nd, 2010, 09:30 PM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
F3 ...
Love to see if the camera ramps and how about that EX IR problem ... still there?
__________________
Sony EX3, Panasonic DVX 100, SG Blade, Nanoflash, FCP 7, MacBookPro intel. http://www.deanharringtonvisual.com/ |
November 23rd, 2010, 03:34 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Quote:
If you absolutely have to get a camera between now and then the picture might be different but that could involve renting whatever cam you need or even purchasing an AF100 and selling it off in the summer to get more of a "middle production" camera, once all the products are known. |
|
December 5th, 2010, 03:25 AM | #19 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Quote:
|
|
December 5th, 2010, 11:37 AM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Quote:
The IR problem was, more or less, fixed when Sony issued the revised EX1R so it should be fine in the F3. One would think. |
|
December 5th, 2010, 12:19 PM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
I had a dream last night that I got to hold an F3. (sony you are in my head..LOL). In the dream it was a nightmare to hold, it weighted a ton, and the lens had no less that 30 different rings on it... ha ha
I guess I am intimidated by all this. :)
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
December 8th, 2010, 03:14 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Andrew excellent advice.
|
December 10th, 2010, 04:06 PM | #23 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Everyone is incorrectly using the term 'Resolution' when discussing 1080/2k/4k.The number of Pixels does NOT determine resolution. I have only seen one test comparing the EX1, Red One and F23, and the F23 blows the Red away in terms of Resolution even though the F23 is only 1080.
Furthermore, just look at the 5D's resolution, which isn't even really HD and most cheap consumer handycams have more 'resolution' than the 5D. Also, in comparing the F3 to Red One, you should include the cost of either an external recorder (ie nanoFlash, Cinedeck or Ki Pro) or the 444/Dual Link upgrade plus SR recorder (which has no price yet). I'd imagine that the 444 upgrade and SR recorder will make the F3's total cost very close to a ready-to-shoot Red One. Personally, I am torn between wanting a Sony PMW 350 and the F3 for use in our studio for news style programs and for TVCs. |
December 13th, 2010, 01:34 AM | #24 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Since I can't edit my post, I need to correct my comment about the F23 and R1. I went back and read the article again and their conclusion is that the Red at 4k resolves about 25% more than the F23 at 1080, and the Red @2k resolves only 1280x720.
|
December 13th, 2010, 08:03 AM | #25 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,048
|
Steve that makes sense to me. My Red One at 2K 120fps did not impress me and was the reason I sold it.
|
December 13th, 2010, 08:08 AM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
my guess ...
Quote:
__________________
Sony EX3, Panasonic DVX 100, SG Blade, Nanoflash, FCP 7, MacBookPro intel. http://www.deanharringtonvisual.com/ |
|
December 17th, 2010, 03:30 PM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Any info on the lens with zoom? The F3 will be the perfect TVC camera for me but I need to know how it works in use as an ENG camera in addition to how it will work in a 'news' style studio with my EX3 and EX1.
|
December 17th, 2010, 03:38 PM | #28 | |
Wrangler
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posts: 8,314
|
Quote:
I'm in the rental business now, so I on one level, I don't care about the quality, only with having the "hot" camera. In this range, RED is still the hottie on the street. Personally, I'd much rather use the F3, but even though I think it's superior in many ways and WANT to buy one (for personal use), I just don't know if the market will jump its bones like they do the RED (which there are tons of where I live already). I think I'll be waiting till NAB for sure, but waiting for a new RED is one thing I won't be doing.
__________________
Need to rent camera gear in Vancouver BC? Check me out at camerarentalsvancouver.com |
|
December 17th, 2010, 03:49 PM | #29 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
|
Based on how HOT the Panasonic AF100 is pre-selling, the market is obviously looking for a REAL video camera with shallow DOF. I think there are many others like me who are already heavily invested into XDCAM EX including batteries and SxS cards, and look at the F3 as a great option.
|
December 17th, 2010, 04:10 PM | #30 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
F3 option ...
I'm in the same boat as Steve ... the F3 along with my ex3 and even the sgblade coupled on that would make an interesting dual camera set-up.
__________________
Sony EX3, Panasonic DVX 100, SG Blade, Nanoflash, FCP 7, MacBookPro intel. http://www.deanharringtonvisual.com/ |
| ||||||
|
|