|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 22nd, 2007, 09:39 AM | #91 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 500
|
I can't help but feel that a 50mbit palmcorder would bastardize sales of their own corporate / lowend-pro cameras.
If this thing does record 4:2:2 50mbit then it will be a better camera than the (more expensive) F330. Surely no company in their right mind would redirect potential customers to an item with a lower margin?
__________________
Alex |
May 22nd, 2007, 10:49 AM | #92 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
hi there
This camera certainly seems to tick a lot of boxes as an advancement for the Z1..(which depite it's progessive chips, I never considered the V1 was... smaller 1/4" chips, smaller, more fiddly controls, step back for LCD placement etc) I would however echo the reservations about it's size... the Z1 is heavy, once you add mic, large battery, mattebox etc... I use mine with a shoulder mount...but it is very front heavy. While I love the form announced, which looks absolutely outstanding, I'd love it in shoulder form, or even semi-shoulder like say an XL2. but I guess they don't want to step on the ground of the current XDcam's... They are however out of my price bracket. I do see though they have an HDV shoulder cam in the works too, which was one of my queries a few months back... While I doubt it will equal the quality of the XDcam EX, if it's a progressive Z1 in a shoulder mount body that may well do me.. Exciting times... cheers Gareth |
May 22nd, 2007, 11:37 AM | #93 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: SF, Ca
Posts: 421
|
What makes this here Sony beautiful is:
- 1/2" chips - saves to flash cards! - 4:2:0 is fine for green screen - under 8k Sony has finally woken up. This might be (finally) the first under 10k cam that's as good as super16mm film. Bounce pass to Canon and Panny in the corner...will they put up a three or travel out of bounds... |
May 22nd, 2007, 12:19 PM | #94 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 399
|
|
May 22nd, 2007, 01:30 PM | #95 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
Quote:
|
|
May 22nd, 2007, 01:34 PM | #96 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,800
|
See the following: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=91617
|
May 22nd, 2007, 03:09 PM | #97 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Scott, I use the Cavision shoulder mount with a Manfrotto Universal mount... This way I can swap it easily onto my Libec LS38 tripod with the same mount... Not ideal but works fine..... Camera is still very front heavy though!!!
Ray: Check out Boyd's post for info on the HDV shoulder cam... I'm looking forward to this one.. regards Gareth |
May 22nd, 2007, 04:37 PM | #98 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 479
|
Regarding the "hidden surprises" to be revealed, I'm sure hoping for 4 channels of audio and TC in/out.
__________________
Mark Utley Last edited by Mark Utley; May 22nd, 2007 at 05:12 PM. |
May 29th, 2007, 06:30 PM | #99 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
|
I have held off on buying anything video and photo related short of an HD and some memory cards, specifically for this camera. I am all over it when it is announced. bye bye tape!
|
May 29th, 2007, 07:34 PM | #100 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,414
|
he he... Scott you better start buying those 500gb drives for archiving
before you get this cam.... :-) |
May 29th, 2007, 10:15 PM | #101 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 692
|
I did buy a couple of those this past week :-) too cheap to pass up.
|
June 4th, 2007, 10:42 AM | #102 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Madison, Wisconsin
Posts: 621
|
Quote:
|
|
June 4th, 2007, 10:50 AM | #103 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
June 4th, 2007, 10:53 AM | #104 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
With humble nod to Greg's reply - if only I could delete the following... <g>
Quote:
Quote:
Having said that, I've heard that 35 Mbps 4:2:0 isn't as bad as it sounds - has anyone tried it? |
||
June 4th, 2007, 12:24 PM | #105 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Juneau, AK
Posts: 814
|
Not only is it "not bad", but from everything I've heard it is really, really good. There was an article somewhere reviewing the 330 and 350 and it was compared to the Varicam favorably. I haven't used it, but from reading what professionals say about it....well it sounds quite good.
|
| ||||||
|
|