|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 4th, 2015, 09:39 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 96
|
Sony PXW-X200 vs Sony PMW-400K sensitivity at various gain levels
Here's a quick test I did because I had both the Sony X200 and PMW-400K - notice how close the sensitivity is at the various gain levels:
|
|
|
|
April 5th, 2015, 01:07 AM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Sony PXW-X200 vs Sony PMW-400K sensitivity at various gain levels
Some of the help the X200 gets is from it's image processing. Granted, the 400K uses 2/3'' sensors, it may need less processing to get to it's sensitivity level.
Faster lenses might help in the 400K's situation, whereas the X200 is a fixed lens camera. I have no doubts a X300 is coming soon. I hope they remove the software lockout of higher voltages on the DC IN that they introduced on the PMW-300. |
|
|
|
|
April 8th, 2015, 09:20 PM
|
#3 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Diego, Califonia
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Sony PXW-X200 vs Sony PMW-400K sensitivity at various gain levels
In the world of 2/3" B4 lenses, ENG/EFP's are pretty much stuck at f1.8. A long time ago, the first gen IF Canon wide J8x6 went to f1.6. :)
Paul |
|
|
|
|
April 8th, 2015, 09:32 PM
|
#4 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Sony PXW-X200 vs Sony PMW-400K sensitivity at various gain levels
I'm talking about using SLR lens adapters with a 50mm 1.4 or something similar.
I like ENG lenses, but expanding using a 2x extender to Super35 isn't efficient. I like 2/3'' to MFT cause x2 is exactly 4/3''. Really wishing the AF200 would come out. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
