|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9th, 2013, 06:51 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 51
|
Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
These days my footage is primarily shown on the web. There’s minimal or no grading in post, so the footage must be good-to-go when it comes out of the PMW-200. When I do shoot for broadcasters, I let them worry about post production and grading. My question is, when is comes to shooting video to be displayed on the web, is it better to shoot with a hypergamma which clips whites at 100% (HG1, HG2) or with a hypergamma which clips whites at 109% (HG3, HG4)?
|
April 9th, 2013, 06:32 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,053
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
I shoot 109% with the gain at -3db. Internet is still Video legal levels, so if you shoot at 0db, may want to use a 100% gamma.
|
April 11th, 2013, 09:47 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Computers and thus the internet use bit 255 for white, which is 109% in video terms. TV broadcasting uses bit 235 as white, 100%. If you shoot at 100% and then place that web clip on a white web page, any white in the video will appear slightly grey.
So for web delivery you want to use 109%. Just be very careful that your edit software passes video that is above 100% correctly and does not clip it. Some of the filters in Premiere clip at 100%.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
April 12th, 2013, 11:38 AM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 51
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Thanks for the replies. This is good info. Adobe Premiere Pro is the software I use. The footage shot with 109% white registers on the waveform monitor at 109%, so I'm fairly sure the software is passing the footage without clipping. Offhand, do you know which filters in PPro clip at 100%? Again, thanks for the very useful info.
|
April 15th, 2013, 04:38 AM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Do check the scope *after* rendering to be sure. I forget the plugin but years back I had an issue with sky highlights clipping in Premiere and it turned out a plug-in was clipping the video but only on the final rendered result.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
April 15th, 2013, 06:53 AM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 51
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Marcus, I'll be sure to check the scopes after applying the plug-in and rendering. Was it Magic Bullet that caused the clipping, perhaps?
|
April 15th, 2013, 07:40 AM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Not on that occasion although it is very easy to clip levels with the Magic Bullet tools if you aren't careful.*I once enhanced a sunset scene with it only to find that when rendered the sky looked flat as it was all clipped.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
April 15th, 2013, 07:44 AM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 51
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Thanks, Marcus.
|
April 18th, 2013, 05:28 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
The most important thing in Premiere is your filter order. Always have any colour correction filters at the top of the stack, before any other filters to avoid clipping issues. If you do run into clipping issues use the fast color corrector as the first filter in the stack and use the input/output sliders with input at 255 and output at 235. This forces premiere to remap the video from "computer" levels up to bit 255 to "video" levels up to bit 235.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
April 19th, 2013, 10:18 AM | #10 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
Quote:
|
|
May 21st, 2013, 02:12 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Posts: 294
|
Re: Video for the web, 100% or 109% Hypergamma
The old Colorista plugin used to clip. Colorista II doesn't anymore as far as I can see.
Sometimes greyish white are caused by Quicktime, but that is a totally different story about gamma.
__________________
Brainstormnavigator searching for the hole in the sky..... Audiovisual Designer (NL) - http://www.brokxmedia.nl |
| ||||||
|
|