|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 15th, 2011, 12:16 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Posts: 585
|
16:9 vs century wide angles
Has anyone compared the quality of 16:9 inc's EXII 0 6X Wide Attachment vs century optics .6 wide angle for the ex1r?
or just 16:9 vs century lens in general? |
May 16th, 2011, 12:50 PM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Re: 16:9 vs century wide angles
So sorry I can't point you at the discussion I read, but I did see one a while back. IIRC, the Century won by a gnats. Bought one, used it, got a few nice shots but wasn't really delighted, bought Canon 550D and Tokina 11-16 instead, lived happily ever after. YMMV.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
May 17th, 2011, 08:29 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Re: 16:9 vs century wide angles
Robert hard to know as to what you mean by quality. Both are going to have the same issues with barrel distortion. The adapter isn't like a full blown lens where you can be going through over 6 lens elements.
I would suggest going to camera outfit in a larger city that will probably have at least a Century wide angle in inventory and try it out. I have the Century zoom through wide angle which is a very good lens adapter but any wide angle adapter on this camera is going to have a degree of compromise. The differences between the units will be small, if unnoticeable. The Century will be an easier resell. |
| ||||||
|
|