|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 16th, 2010, 11:45 AM | #16 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,435
|
Quote:
|
|
June 16th, 2010, 12:27 PM | #17 | |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,450
|
Quote:
Would you mind pointing a few of them out, because I must have missed every one of them. I can't recall a single SxS problem being talked about that wasn't the result of operator error or a hardware problem with the camera itself. Apparently I have missed "plenty" of them. Could you point me to a few of the posts. Thanks. Doug
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
|
June 16th, 2010, 12:31 PM | #18 |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,450
|
The abiity to use Clip Browser (and FCP Transfer if you are a FCP owner) is critical to the XDCAM workflow. If you use cheaper cards that prevent the normal workflow, you have wasted valuable time, important metadata, and possibly even frames of video or entire clips. That's the issue.
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
June 16th, 2010, 01:21 PM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Quote:
I'm sure you can figure out how to use the forum search feature but such a search quickly showed a few examples including one chap who had his SxS pack up 40 minutes into a card. The guy got his card replaced but it was scant compensation. Things can and do go wrong. I do know someone who spent some considerable time helping a colleague recover a corrupted clip from an SxS card. We know your position on SDHC. That's fair enough, but shouting loudest isn't justification in itself. SDHC is a minefield and frankly some people shouldn't be using it because they don't understand what they are doing, but for those who can get the workflow sussed there's many benefits to be had including the ability to retain stock as if it were tape. Sony recognise SDHC as a solution now and the firmware has been updated. We know which cards are to be trusted and which to avoid. It is a minefield if you don't know what you are doing. And going back to the OP, I doubt SDHC had anything to do with it frankly. Just a bad transfer or some kind of glitch.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
|
June 16th, 2010, 01:25 PM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Quote:
After all, how many times have you copied a file from one hard disk to another and found that it corrupted on the way across? In short, not in 25 years of being a computer user. Even my Sinclair Spectrum CRC checks data when loading from tape! So what gives? Is this CRC check giving people false confidence? Is it checking what the OS would check anyway?
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
|
June 16th, 2010, 04:09 PM | #21 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bridgenorth
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
This comes back to the original question of why the files are corrupting when using Clip Browser to transfer them - and even more troublesome is that the transfer is occurring with the CRC check in place. So the logic is completely upside down in Ivan's report: the supposed "least safe way" to transfer - Windows Explorer - is actually proving to be the most reliable. While the supposed "most safe way" - Sony Clip Browser with CRC check - is failing. |
|
June 16th, 2010, 04:25 PM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 762
|
I'm still unclear as to whether all the clips would play in the camera or not. His description was a bit confusing as to what would play and when. If they will all play okay in the camera, then the problem is downstream from there. However, that "Class 2" speed issue is still hanging out there too.
|
June 16th, 2010, 04:36 PM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Don't the Sandisk cards say something like "Ultra 2" but then have the actual class rating in small writing? That might be causing confusion.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
June 16th, 2010, 04:52 PM | #24 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 73
|
I'm sorry this thread has turned into another SxS vs. SDHC discussion - it was really not my intention, as you can see in my original post, my story ends with me asking if there is another program I could use instead Clip Browser.
Just for the record, I have been happily using 2 Class 4 and 1 Class 2 16GB Sandisk Ultra II cards with an e-films adaptor for a long time. I never had any problems except once I lost a little bit of a 48fps overcranked clip. I filled all three cards with 48fps footage and one clip failed, but I was able to recover almost all of it. I've been thinking of getting SXS-1 some day, but not now. Still too expensive for my taste, I don't shoot much paid stuff, I always state the 1% possibility of failure, and so on. I just bought 64GB in SDHC cards for 200 instead of 1200. As some of you figured out already, my clips are fine. The problem was with Clip Browser. I'm sorry if this wasn't clear in my original post, it was never stated, but I thought it could be deducted. I promise for the sake of your curiosity I will run some tests, like, downloading the clips to another hard drive or downloading from the camera instead of using the card reader. This should help us narrow down the problem and see what we should watch out for in the future. So windows explorer has a good built-in check? For copying and moving files. I'm on a difficult position here, really. I even started using Clip Browser some time ago "to play it safe" - before I just copy-pasted with explorer - but imagine the consequences of checking a correctly copied clip, assuming everything is ok, and not editing the footage until some weeks later. I shoot quite often, so, there will be no chance to re-downloading anything... *sigh* |
June 17th, 2010, 03:44 AM | #25 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,082
|
Quote:
I make a folder on my external HDD and then sub folders for each of my sxs cards. I copy my SxS cards to the external HDD with C.Browser. Once all cards are copied I then copy and paste that folder from (with all the sub folders) the external HD to one on my PCs Hard drives. I switch off the PC and the external HD. Start the PC again, bring the clips into the Edius timeline from my PC internal HD via CB. I would look through the clips on the timeline making sure everything was there that I recorded. Then I copy and paste that folder to another internal HD making 3 copies off that project saved to HDrives. |
|
June 17th, 2010, 08:47 PM | #26 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 73
|
Allright guys, apparently the problem's my hard drive. Copying them to my other hard drive gives me no problems at all.
So I guess Clip Browser doesn't really verify the data in a "100% satisfaction" way. It would be nice to have a program that automatically checks the copied files not by just looking at numbers with a CRC, but actually somehow playing bits of it, frames for example, to check if there is any wrong or anomalous. I HATE failing drives. Oh well, I guess I'll have to buy another one... again. Moral of the story, Beevare of the big fat hard drive that lives beneath your case... he eats little boys, puppy dog tails, and, big, fat clips. Having more than just one copy seems very reasonable - if not absolutely necessary. I would say checking the clips is very necessary as well, but the problem is still efficiency on this last subject. I just made a test and Premiere warns me about these bad clips when trying to conform them though, that's good for efficiency. Thanks for sharing your workflow Anthony, it seems pretty flawless... I would like to ask if you don't mind, why the switch off and on step? Thanks, Iván. |
June 17th, 2010, 10:27 PM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,435
|
Do you copy and paste using CB or Windows? I always use CB for everything that deals with footage. When I first got my EX1 I copied and pasted folders using Windows. Everything was fine for about a month. Then one day as I was editing, I noticed a dropout in my footage. It wasn't recoverable because I had already erased my SxS card. Since then, I've always used CB for transferring all files, every time. No problems since...that was about 3 years ago.
|
June 18th, 2010, 02:07 AM | #28 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,082
|
Quote:
Perhaps I should use CB for everything. Thanks. |
|
June 18th, 2010, 04:04 AM | #29 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SouthWest Suburbs of Chicago, IL
Posts: 55
|
Iván, could you check one clip in question to see if the file size (in bytes) of the file that you copied to your destination hard drive exactly matches the file size from your original media? I would suspect that Clip Browser doesn't report any copy errors if the file sizes are the same.
Another test would be to copy the problematic file to another physical drive - to confirm it's not some sort of performance issue with one specific drive. (Maybe the actual clip itself is fine - but the specific drive speed/bandwith is the issue- especially if it's failing) Maybe it's possible that the original copy was in fact "ok", but some other corruption to the file occured after the transfer? There wouldn't be anything else suddenly interfering with playback from the drive (virus checker, updated playback software, hard-drive setting change, etc)? You never know when some OS automatically updates some driver or something. (I keep mine disabled) |
June 18th, 2010, 02:23 PM | #30 |
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,082
|
Well when I switch off my external HD Edius only reads from the copied files on my internal PC HD and if it reads them OK it proves to me that my original copy to my external HD was good. Well thats what I think anyway.
|
| ||||||
|
|