|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 21st, 2010, 11:23 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 318
|
SD card slot on CPU for SDHC card transfers ?
MxM claims on their website:
"never use the SD slot on the laptop to transfer your footage to your hard drive as doing so may corrupt your data and SDHC card, use any available 34 adapter or certified reader" have you found this to be true? what are your thoughts or experiences? thanks, Mike |
February 22nd, 2010, 01:46 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
I usually do use the SD slot + EX ClipBrowser to preview and transfer the clips to the editing system and have had no problems so far.
Some have advised turning the card's "write lock" to on to prevent the system from writing anything to the card.
__________________
Bob |
February 22nd, 2010, 11:27 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 318
|
thanks for the "write lock" tip. i'll give it a try.
|
February 23rd, 2010, 12:58 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
I assume there could really be a problem if anything will be written on the card, however the "workflow" with the reader prevents other problems, too - such as losing or misplacing a card, or mess up cards (accidental deleting) or breaking the lock. From MxM point of view this matter definitely helps to sell more adapters. But if you compare the prices to the SxS cards it really wont matter - and now (at least in the EX1r) the MxM soultion works same as SxS, with any rate or setting. Never failed a frame while using them.
__________________
Sony XDCAM EX1r, Canon 5DMkII, Røde NTG2, Røde NT1000, Røde Stereo Videomic, Sachtler DV6 SB on Gitzo 1325V, Steadicam Merlin, Omnitracker, Hackintosh 3.5Ghz Quad 8Gb RAM |
|
February 23rd, 2010, 05:00 AM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 693
|
Quote:
Windows on the other hand, if you have a virus then might run into problems.
__________________
Marcus Durham Media2u, Corporate Video Production For Your Business - http://www.media2u.co.uk |
|
February 23rd, 2010, 08:28 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,238
|
For all we know, inserting the SD card with your left hand may also "corrupt your data and SDHC card" since they offer no evidence of WHY they say that.
I have never followed this advice and I have had no issues with my SDHC cards. |
February 24th, 2010, 11:04 AM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monument, CO
Posts: 109
|
I've only experienced this problem once. Filming a live event, 7 cameras. I was the only handheld so fortunately my footage amounted to B-roll material. One of my clips had a few minutes of corruption. I was able to salvage the footage eventually but playback of the original clip is inconsistent. Sometimes it will work but most of the time you have to skip past the corrupt portion. The sound was completely trashed for that portion of the clip. The DP wanted to download straight to his Mac in the green room and didn't want to use the USB from the camera. I've never had any other issues with these cards though.
|
February 24th, 2010, 12:10 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 318
|
well, it sounds like if we switch the "write lock" on then we shouldn't have any problems. i still don't understand the argument of how using an external USB reader will avoid the CPU from writing data back to the cards as MxM's statement may be suggesting. just my guess. i use a SD card for my stills camera and when i use a USB reader with my older MBP then use the same card and reader on my PC i notice weird Mac files on the card. as of right now i think the "write lock" technique is probably the best way to go regardless of using an external reader or not.
|
| ||||||
|
|