|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
January 24th, 2010, 06:55 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
jagged edges within certain frames question?
I just finished filming and editing a commercial for a local radio station competition and while reviewing the final product I noticed that in some of the frames it looks as if the zebra button is on the actual image (that is the only way I can explain it)
It seems as if certain objects have a fuzz to them and other sharp objects (a printer) has squiggly lines or something of the sorts. I feel these are due to the lighting scenarios I was shooting in but am not sure so I was hoping I could get some feedback. FYI I am writing on the XDCAM EX forum because I am using the EX1R so maybe some users have been in similar situations and could provide me a solution or alternative. Thanks in advance. |
January 24th, 2010, 07:18 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Can you post a sample or screenshot?
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
January 24th, 2010, 07:29 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
That would prob. be the best thing to do let me see if I can do that.
|
January 24th, 2010, 10:44 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
Perrone Ford, So I went back and looked at all the clips through the camera and an HDMI cable plugged into my TV and saw none of the things I spoke of in the final video. I am using FCP 6 and am wondering now what the problem may be. I use log and transfer to import.
Any suggestions? |
January 24th, 2010, 10:55 PM | #5 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Well, without knowing at what steps the problem was introduced, it's hard to say. Maybe you log and transfer settings were bad. Maybe your final export settings were wrong. Maybe it was a one-time glitch. Who can say...
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
January 24th, 2010, 11:05 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
Well from the footage played back by the camera onto the TV I can tell it wasnt that. What settings should I have in FCP? for log and transfer I have it configured to XDCAM EX 1080p 24 frames per second.
In order to have the 1080p would I need an external blue-ray burner? Im confused so I apologize for the all the questions. |
January 24th, 2010, 11:09 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
January 25th, 2010, 12:06 AM | #8 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
|
XDCAM EX is fine for your codec in FCP but you need to set it to render in Pro Res.
You have (like many people on the forum) provided far too little information for anyone to tell you what happened. If you are serious about getting help here you need to list every step of your process in great detail. |
January 25th, 2010, 01:43 AM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
How are you viewing the finished video?
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
January 25th, 2010, 09:39 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
I shot everything in 1080p24 then went on to log and transfer it into fcp6 straight from the express card slot on the mac after editing it was saved to .mov and because it was quicker and we just wanted to see the finished product on tv we used Idvd to burn it onto a dvd.
In all do honesty Im not quite sure what other information to provide and yes I am serious about getting help. |
January 25th, 2010, 09:42 AM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
It is probably the conversion from HD to SD that's causing the problem. If you start off with too much resolution and downconvert to SD you will get aliasing. You need to soften the HD before downconverting to SD. Take a look at this article: XDCAM-USER.com Getting SD from Hd and the problems of oversampling
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
January 25th, 2010, 09:47 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 75
|
Ok great. But if I wanted to keep it 1080p24 how would I export it or what should I do in FCP in order to keep its original resolution?
Keep in mind I have only recently started working with FCP and XDCAM EX so its a grand learning process for me. I do appreciate all the input and help I have received from DVINFO users thus far. |
January 25th, 2010, 09:49 AM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|
January 25th, 2010, 10:56 AM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Sure it isn't all about resolution, but it's the bulk of the problem. The frame grabs in my article illustrate it very well. It's all down to Nyquist Theory. Take a transition from light to dark that in HD uses four pixels and drop that down to just 2 pixels in SD and instead of a soft edge you have an instant hard light to dark switch, which doesn't look good or natural. Simply softening the HD image with a 2 two to 3 pixel blur can really improve the quality of the SD downconvert.
Your end result when down converting from HD to SD will depend on whether the down conversion algorithm applies any interpolation or softening. A high quality converter should do a good job, but a basic frame size conversion may just dump pixels resulting in a nasty image. It's one of the reasons DSLR's suffer from so much aliasing when used for video: Too much resolution. It's why quality video cameras have optical low pass filters that reduce the image resolution to around half that of the sensor resolution. It's counter intuitive I know but you really can have too much resolution.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
January 25th, 2010, 11:12 AM | #15 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Ok, I see what you're getting at. It's not that you necessarily have too much resolution, it's that poor handling of it as you move to lower resolutiuon leads to issue. Yes, we see this all the time. And it's why I do my downconversions with Lanczos or bicubic spline algorithms. They seem to produce excellent quality.
It's unfortunate these aren't available in modern NLEs, as it would solve a lot of issues. -P
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
| ||||||
|
|