|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 23rd, 2010, 06:14 PM | #16 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Weirton, WV
Posts: 412
|
Very interesting -- thanks!
|
February 23rd, 2010, 07:33 PM | #17 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
|
|
February 24th, 2010, 02:12 AM | #18 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Looks to be an exact half stop difference between the two cameras, but your tests don't show the very real differential focus advantages the bigger chips bestow, at the same field of view and aperture.
|
February 24th, 2010, 02:15 AM | #19 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: East Bay Cali
Posts: 563
|
Quote:
__________________
----------------sig----------------- Re-learning everything all over again, one more time. |
|
February 24th, 2010, 02:18 AM | #20 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Quote:
So no, the NX will never match the EX but then it does have its own advantages - like less mass, more zoom, on-board GPS, a lot cheaper and so on. tom. |
|
March 2nd, 2010, 03:43 AM | #21 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
i just read through this thread, unless something changed, the nx5cam is Full raster 1920x1080...
|
March 2nd, 2010, 05:47 AM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
The recording format is 1920x1080, but the chips on the NXCAM can't fully do that justice - they are only 1 megapixel, not the 2 megapixel that are really needed to do 1920x1080 justice. (And which the EX has.)
|
March 2nd, 2010, 06:32 AM | #23 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
oh ok....all in account shooting a indie film, post processing, then to dvd/blu-ray/online, will there be a big advantage/quality difference between the 2?
|
March 2nd, 2010, 06:46 AM | #24 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
I'd expect the EX to be better. The 2 megapixel chips don't simply mean sharper, they mean you can reduce detail enhancement without the picture looking too soft - that equates to "more natural".
Bigger chips also mean less depth of field, and there are a host of other differencesin practical use. True manual lenses for example, not via servo. |
March 2nd, 2010, 06:58 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: www.faymusmedia.com
Posts: 203
|
i know this may be slightly off subject but is this a good deal? and can this camera live up to the ex1r or nx5u?
Panasonic HVX 200 HD Camera + 16Gb P2 Card+ Barry Green book |
March 2nd, 2010, 11:02 AM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fletcher Hills, CA
Posts: 211
|
Quote:
|
|
March 2nd, 2010, 12:14 PM | #27 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
My first glance at the NX5 gave me the impression that it would be about the size and weight of the V1- and be a considerable advantage over the EX1 in that department.
But looking closely at the specs, the EX1 is actually only about a pound heavier.
__________________
Bob |
| ||||||
|
|