|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#16 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
Adding a Nanoflash to the PMW350 should cover most all of the bases of the 700/800, with less weight and required battery power. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 56
|
Point well taken Paul, I do need to work with one before making such a decision. My only experience so far was working with some ungraded footage and I though it was quite excellent.
To me it is about the 2/3" image quality, and the ability to use primes. I have the Schneider and 16x9Inc wide angle adapters for my EX1 and EX3. Neither thrill me, but I cant entirely blame the adapters because the Sony stock lens isn't exactly distortion free at its widest, so the aftermarket lenses are only going to exacerbate that problem. I am hesitant to do the Letus/Redrock adapter route since I am not sure that the same exact thing wont happen since I am shooting with the stock glass on the wide end. Therefore I am going to have to use a real cinema lens, and sticking one on the EX3 with the 1/2" chips ruins hopes of a wide angle. The 2/3" B mount will give me what I need or a PL mount RED. So there is the issue in a nutshell, at least for me. If Sony and Canon would only release a camera that shot RAW video, and someone please make a camera that can shoot 1080p/60! I am positive the Sony 350 will be an excellent camera, I have no doubts that it will be very popular. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|