|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 1st, 2009, 07:01 AM | #1 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Video Guide to EX gamma curves
I have just uploaded a brief guide to the EX gamma curves to youtube.
YouTube - XDCAM EX Gamma Curves and Knee, what they do and which ones to use. You can find all my guides on this page: XDCAM-USER.com How to Videos
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 1st, 2009, 07:11 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Thanks for that Alister.
Very very well done. John |
September 1st, 2009, 03:44 PM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: bendigo, australia
Posts: 204
|
Excellent job Alister! Very helpful.
Thanks Jamie |
September 1st, 2009, 04:23 PM | #4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 49
|
Thanks, Alister. Very clearly explained.
|
September 1st, 2009, 05:00 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
It is worth noting where the various STD gammas come from though. Don't discount them. For example STD gamma 4 is 'BBC' gamma with an initial gain of 4.0x and was designed for post grading before all these new fangled cine gammas came in. It gives you quite a bit of range to work with, albeit without the smooth highlight rolloff of the cines.
Regarding cinegamma 2 I would also point out that although it gives legal levels, would you really leave your video untouched using this gamma setting? Probably not, so you might as well use the other gammas that give you the full tonal range. One last thing, regarding Cines 3 and 4. I'm not sure that they actually have less highlight handling capability as such than 1 and 2. They seem to cram the same amount of overall contrast into the same amount of tonal range, but tend to put the emphasis on certain areas. So the highlight regions get less tonal range rather than less overall contrast (black to peak white detail) contrast range. Could be wrong, but thats how I'm reading the cine curves. Overall Cines 3 and 4 are still cramming 400% overload into 100% signal. If they were capturing less contrast range then at their peak white capability they would be capturing, for example off the top of my head, 300% input for 100% output or 200% input for 100% output. But I'm not an engineer so... Would this be in the ball park? |
September 1st, 2009, 05:20 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,222
|
Excellent tutorial. The EX community is grateful for your production.
|
September 1st, 2009, 08:11 PM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,124
|
Great job Alllister. Thanks for taking the time to do this. Very well done.
__________________
Sony EX3, Canon 5D MkII, Chrosziel Matte Box, Sachtler tripod, Steadicam Flyer, Mac Pro, Apple/Adobe software - 20 years as a local videographer/editor |
September 2nd, 2009, 01:19 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Your reading of the curves Simon is correct. I struggled with the appropriate, simple words to describe the differences with the way the CG's handle highlights. I believe the highlights in CG's 3 and 4 are not as well handled as in CG1 due to the extra highlight compression, hence the words chosen.
I could have gone on to state where each of the standard gammas originates, but for most people watching a clip at this level it would probably be fairly meaningless. What most people want to know is what difference does it make to the picture, not whether they are variations on 701, 601 etc. I do state that the cinegammas are designed to be graded in the video, however it's not essential, just personal choice. These video's are simple 4 minute guides that I am making available for free. I'm not going to spend hours going into every last detail, for example I don't touch on knee slope or knee sat. I hope they will act as a starting point for those that currently have no idea what some of these tools do.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 2nd, 2009, 01:57 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Sorry Alister, my post was really meant as an supplementary set of notes to your video, so I apologise if I came over in the wrong way. I wasn't suggesting that that sort of detail should have been included as I realise that you needed to keep things straightforward and simple. :-)
|
September 2nd, 2009, 02:18 AM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mooroolbark, Victoria, AU
Posts: 63
|
Thanks Alistair,
I'm new to the EX3 coming from JVC HD101, and I found your contribution most helpful. regards Ian Skurri |
September 2nd, 2009, 06:03 AM | #11 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,409
|
Thanks Alistair,
I looked forward to these guides you do. Have a question. Does the F350 have the same Cinegamma cures. Thanks |
September 2nd, 2009, 10:11 AM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
PMW-EX1/EX3 has the same CineGammas as the PDW-F350/F330/F335/355. Cinegammas 1 and 2 are the same as the Hypergammas HG4 and HG2 as found on the PDW-700 and F900R etc.
CINE1 : Same as the HyperGamma HG4 CINE2 : Same as the HyperGamma HG2 CINE3 : Independent setting for EX1/EX3 CINE4 : Independent setting for EX1/EX3 PDW-700 has HyperGamma (Ver1.2 or higher) such as, HG1 : 325% D-range is compressed to 100% HG2 : 460% D-range is compressed to 100% HG3 : 325% D-range is compressed to 109% HG4 : 460% D-range is compressed to 109%
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 2nd, 2009, 10:42 AM | #13 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Malvern UK
Posts: 1,931
|
Thats interesting that the 700 is only compressing a 480% overload. In that case there should be a lot of scope for the Digital Praxis curves that could be used in the F800 since the chips should be capable of a 600% overload.
|
September 2nd, 2009, 12:00 PM | #14 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
On the 700 you can use a combination of standard gamma, knee and DCC to get 600%. DCC can be forced on in the menus and in effect you get a double knee.
Those figures did surprise me as I know when the HyperGammas are used the DCC gets taken over by the HG's and DCC can be set to operate at 600% I have played with the knee/fixed DCC combo a bit but didn't like the look. Perhaps I need to re-visit.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 2nd, 2009, 06:37 PM | #15 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
Awesome video Al!!
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam |
| ||||||
|
|