|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 13th, 2009, 04:11 PM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
Finally, data writing onto the PDW-U1 for Macs
We can now just dump our BPAV onto the pro discs via drag and drop and anything else we want to put on there!
Philip Bloom Blog Archive Finally. The best way to archive SxS and anything else you want! |
August 13th, 2009, 07:26 PM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wayne, PA
Posts: 207
|
If the EX clips are wrapped as an MFX will the Sony XDcam decks see them as video, or are the EX clips just transferred to the PDW U1 as data files?
In other words if I write to a PDW U1 then put it in an XDCAM 1500 deck will it show up in thumbnails and be viewable as video? |
August 13th, 2009, 08:19 PM | #3 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 120
|
Phil - I own an EX1 and although my data needs I'm sure are much more tame than yours (I'm not doing near the volume of work you are), I don't personally own a PMW-U1. I'm thinking, however, that it would be viable for me to store to a mirrored set of drives when I archive, then transfer those over to XDCAM media when filled by renting the PMW-U1 and purchasing the media as-needed.
So forgive my ignorance on this next question due to my lack of experience with XDCAM media - is the shelf life significantly more impressive than that of a standard-issue burnable CD-ROM or DVD has turned out to be? They're saying now that the shelf life for those that you'd pick up at a store for regular burning or backing up is 10 years or so on best, last I remember. I'm not backing up to optical media right now, but if XDCAM isn't any better than that, I think I'd be better of with the mirrored drive set, one kept off-site... |
August 13th, 2009, 09:57 PM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,435
|
The PDW-U1 costs about $2800. A 50gig XDCAM disc runs around $60 each. For that amount of money, you can buy TWENTY EIGHT 1 terabyte hard drives.
|
August 13th, 2009, 10:44 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 121
|
Drobo vs. Floppy Disks
Sorry, I can't resist: for that kind of money, you could buy a fully loaded 16TB DroboPro or perhaps over 9600 3.5" floppy disks (~14GB of storage!)
<rant>The debate over archival strategies rages on and the only conclusion that I've come to is that different people have different requirements, differing value placed on the content, as well as different definitions of the word "archival". For some, I think using XDCAM discs for long-term storage is brilliant. For others, maybe just using spinning rust (hard drives) would suffice. YMMV, yada yada yada, if you can't justify solution "X", then you can't justify solution "X". I can't justify a robotic LTO tape library, but that doesn't mean my material isn't valuable to me. I use an archival strategy I trust and one that I can justify.</rant> |
August 13th, 2009, 10:57 PM | #6 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 121
|
Oh, and thanks Phil!
Almost forgot to thank Phil for letting us know the good news.
Once the summer rush is over, I'll probably consider one of these drives. |
August 13th, 2009, 11:43 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 173
|
For the cost & time savings I went with a DroboPro. I was holding off for the U1 drive to be upgraded but I just can't ignore how little a loaded DroboPro is in comparison.
|
August 14th, 2009, 01:30 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
The Sony professional discs are designed to have a shelf life of 50 years. I've seen a couple of Drobo systems go bad corrupting the entire file system so not as impressed by them as I once was.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
August 14th, 2009, 01:41 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,939
|
it is professional solution for professional archiving. Just sticking your rushes on a hard drive is not a safe enough archiving solution for me.
|
August 14th, 2009, 07:03 AM | #10 |
Major Player
|
This IS a more expensive professional archive option, but fortunately there are many other solutions out there that range in price/speed/workflow, that are equally reliable and professional.
|
August 14th, 2009, 07:27 AM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 120
|
|
August 14th, 2009, 08:34 AM | #12 |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 18
|
Drives to LTO
You could also just use a 750-gig drive (specifically, yes) and take it down to your local video house/archival storage place and have them archive it for long term storage on LTO tape (which hold 800 gigs on LTO-4). Locally here in Minnesota that could be done for somewhere in the price range of $10/transfer and $0.10/gigabyte (about $85.00). Quite inexpensive and LTO has a 30+ year rating.
|
August 14th, 2009, 09:10 AM | #13 | |
Vortex Media
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,442
|
Quote:
I think I'll be archiving from now on with 50GB optical disks because I already own a PDW-U1. Obviously, if you don't have a PDW-U1 then it might not make sense for you.
__________________
Vortex Media http://www.vortexmedia.com/ Sony FS7, F55, and XDCAM training videos, field guides, and other production tools |
|
August 14th, 2009, 10:42 AM | #14 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 1,435
|
|
August 14th, 2009, 11:33 PM | #15 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 18
|
drives to LTO
Quote:
Warren -- have you priced out hard drive recovery? You may as well spend the money on the other systems up front and not worry about it. |
|
| ||||||
|
|