|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
June 22nd, 2009, 09:46 PM | #16 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Parkland Florida
Posts: 407
|
Image artifact
Quote:
On another note, I have not yet purchased a matte box but am seriously considering the Cavision and will probably make that purchase in the next few days. Thanks again. |
|
June 22nd, 2009, 11:06 PM | #17 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 131
|
Sorry not getting it. Need to see it. Check the Picture Profile topics at top of page, and try some new settings.
Good Luck, any more questions just let me know. J |
June 23rd, 2009, 08:07 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Parkland Florida
Posts: 407
|
Artefact
It was suggested that I try lowering the "detail" setting. Since this might indeed be the problem I will give it a try.
|
June 26th, 2009, 11:20 AM | #19 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Ron,
If you haven't checked out the Redrock Micro mattebox, you should. It's in your price range and many that have it think the bang for the buck is the best out there for matteboxes. The ARRI setup is very nice but the rig you were talking about with follow focus (as I am sure you know) is in the $3500 USD range. |
June 27th, 2009, 10:53 AM | #20 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Parkland Florida
Posts: 407
|
Matte Box
Quote:
Thank you for the suggestion but I had already decided against the RedRock MicroMatte primarily due to the weight factor (>2lbs). In addition, I agree that the Arri is an expensive piece of equipment whose cost/function ratio I could not personally justify and as a result I have purchased the Cavision Matte Box, Flags, etc. It is less than half the weight of the RedRock and performs the same function as the Arri but perhaps without it's panache. For the time being, I will forgo a Follow Focus but should I decide in favor of one in the future I will consider the Zacuto. |
|
| ||||||
|
|