Editing long GOP - is it a nightmare? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds
Sony PXW-Z280, Z190, X180 etc. (going back to EX3 & EX1) recording to SxS flash memory.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 25th, 2009, 06:06 AM   #1
New Boot
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 13
Editing long GOP - is it a nightmare?

Hey guys, I'm just about to put my cash down for a new EX1 but the one reservation that I still have about the camera is the seemingly horrendous render times etc involved with the Long GOP compression format. Anybody care to share their experiences? In hindsight, would it put you off XDCAM EX in any way? Thanks in advance.

Steve
Steve McClean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 06:35 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McClean View Post
Hey guys, I'm just about to put my cash down for a new EX1 but the one reservation that I still have about the camera is the seemingly horrendous render times etc involved with the Long GOP compression format. Anybody care to share their experiences? In hindsight, would it put you off XDCAM EX in any way? Thanks in advance.

Steve
I had the same question and bought Vortex Media's "test drive" disk with lots of EX files in all different formats. You could test that out on your particular NLE and transcoding software. The way I have my particular system setup with a decent dual processor, 4GB of RAM, and video drive in RAID 0 configuration - it is essentially like editing in DV. I have done up to 3 layers of mp4 files and it will still play realtime from the timeline. The render times (out to say- blu-ray legal parameters) are approximately the same as with HDV but certainly not in the range of AVCHD.
Barry J. Weckesser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 08:01 AM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 528
Render times are dependent on the hardware and NLE - much more so I think than the Camera's compression format.
I run an 8-core Mac Pro with 16G Ram and huge amounts of free disc space on my raid. There are no render times. I edit with XDCAM EX 1080/24p timelines and there are zero render issues and no playback lags.
Jon Braeley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 08:17 AM   #4
New Boot
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 13
Would you say that a Raid hard disc set up is essential then to problem free performance? I don't currently have this on my mac... thanks

Steve
Steve McClean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 08:47 AM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NE of London, England
Posts: 788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McClean View Post
Would you say that a Raid hard disc set up is essential then to problem free performance? I don't currently have this on my mac... thanks

Steve
No, it isn't essential. Even USB external is okay but I would recommend at least firewire 800. Render times are going to be more dependent on processor and RAM. 4GB or so is fine. Any Mac Pro or Macbook Pro should edit XDCAM HD easily. For basic editing, there should be very little rendering required.
__________________
www.mikemarriage.com
Mike Marriage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25th, 2009, 10:31 AM   #6
Sponsor: Westside AV
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mount Washington Valley, NH, USA
Posts: 1,365
If you use FCP then make your sequence XDcamEX and then set renders up as Prores422 or Prores422HQ this gives you a fast workflow and no loss of quality with transitions etc. It all plays back great.

If you jump into Color for grading render back as Prores422 or Prores422HQ.
Olof Ekbergh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 01:20 AM   #7
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olof Ekbergh View Post
If you use FCP then make your sequence XDcamEX and then set renders up as Prores422 or Prores422HQ this gives you a fast workflow and no loss of quality with transitions etc. It all plays back great.
Unless you are going to be mastering back to XDCAM, in which case you may as well keep everything as XDCAM to avoid an extra compression stage getting your renders back from ProRes to XDCAM.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com
Alister Chapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 01:34 AM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 462
I edit in Avid Media Composer on a 3.0 GHz Dual core PC with very nice performance. However - I would not recommend using external firewire/USB2-drives. I have an internal software raid with 2 Samsung 1 TB-drives striped. They give me a 140 Mb/s datastream compared to 35 Mb/s for an USB2 drive. Fast drives are really essential for fast response times when moving through your timeline!!
__________________
Ola Christoffersson, Kamrat produktion, Stockholm - Sweden
www.kamrat.tv
Ola Christoffersson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 11:40 AM   #9
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 48
I film rugby in 720p/50. Typical timeline length is 1 hour 10-15mins. Consists of slomo try replays, 2 tracks of graphics and the raw footage. Takes my PC around 15 -20 minutes to render to mpeg2 for dvd use.

Its 2 Quad core I7's (effectively 16 cores), 12gb ram and 3tb raid using Edius 5.1. No probs with real time playback or anything like that.

Stuart
Stuart Wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 05:02 PM   #10
New Boot
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 13
Thanks guys, this has put my mind at rest.

Steve

Last edited by Steve McClean; May 26th, 2009 at 05:33 PM.
Steve McClean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26th, 2009, 05:13 PM   #11
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mount Rainier, MD
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Olof Ekbergh View Post
If you use FCP then make your sequence XDcamEX and then set renders up as Prores422 or Prores422HQ this gives you a fast workflow and no loss of quality with transitions etc. It all plays back great.
I actually like to set my Sequence settings as ProRes422. That way you can export a Quicktime Reference file quickly. I do a render at lunch, at the end of the day, or any breaks. Then everything gets transcoded to ProRes422 for better realtime effects performance.
Brett Sherman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2009, 12:03 AM   #12
Major Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
34 minute fan film we did (1920x1080x30 mxf) took about 2:30 hours to render in Vegas 8.1 but we changed the colors and applied a scratchy film effect... computer specs in my sig.
__________________
EX3, Q6600 Quad core PC - Vista 64, Vegas 8.1 64bit, SR11 b-cam
Erik Phairas is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony XDCAM EX Pro Handhelds


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network