|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 25th, 2009, 12:49 PM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lawrenceville, GA
Posts: 69
|
what the heck is "overcrank"?
I have had numerous users post use the word "overcrank" when it comes to sony's phu60k or the SHDC memory card option....Can someone please define to me what in the world is "overcrank"....Thanks
|
March 25th, 2009, 12:58 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
overcrank - my posts when someone says they're not using ClipBrowser with CRC on.
It's a film term dating back to when cameras were hand cranked. The cranking the camera faster (or slower) would change the film playback in the projector which was at 16fps (or 24fps depending on the time period referred to). Set EX to 720p24 p25 p30 and use S&Q and set to a faster frame rate which results in slower playback. Of course one can learn this and many other things when using Google. Slow motion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Last edited by Craig Seeman; March 26th, 2009 at 08:12 AM. |
March 26th, 2009, 06:33 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 233
|
Craig you must be an "oldie" like me.
|
March 26th, 2009, 07:28 AM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 975
|
Simply put, the intent of overcrank is to get the slow motion look. It is effectively done by increasing the frame rate.
A typical scenario would be to double the frame rate. So if you are in North America shooting at 29.97 (30) frames a second you would set your EX camera to 60 frames using S&Q mode at 720/60. The big caveat that some people don't know or forget is that to get effective frame rate increases on the EX you have to be shooting in 720 and not 1080. You can "apparently" shoot up to 42 frames of overcrank on the SDHC cards but most (read almost all) people use genuine SxS cards for "slomo" work. It's not worth the risk of dropping frames. The Sony hardisk recorder has the same bandwidth limitations as the SDHC cards so I would avoid using that as well for slomo shooting. |
March 26th, 2009, 03:11 PM | #5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Moab, UT
Posts: 264
|
Quote:
It doesn't say anything about not using the Mac Finder to copy the whole folder. Is there a technical rationale against using the Finder to copy the whole folder? |
|
March 26th, 2009, 03:21 PM | #6 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,124
|
OMG!! You just woke up a ticking time bomb. (wait to Craig reads this!) hehehehe
__________________
Sony EX3, Canon 5D MkII, Chrosziel Matte Box, Sachtler tripod, Steadicam Flyer, Mac Pro, Apple/Adobe software - 20 years as a local videographer/editor |
March 26th, 2009, 05:59 PM | #7 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
Quote:
ClipBrowser uses CRC which verifies the copy. ShotPut does this too. The rationale is that you don't want to have to pay for the re-shoot or lose the client due to a corrupted master file. As I heard yet another Sony rep say, entirely unprovoked by anyone even asking the question. "NEVER drag and drop folders or files. Use ClipBrowser!" I have a hunch he was sick and tired of the support phone calls asking how to rescue a corrupted master clip. |
|
March 26th, 2009, 07:06 PM | #8 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Moab, UT
Posts: 264
|
Well, it's not a technical rationale, but it does get one's attention.
|
March 26th, 2009, 07:11 PM | #9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
The technical rationale is CRC. ClipBrowser and ShotPut do file verification.
Generally if you want to decrease the risk of technical problems you use ClipBrowser. A corrupt file is a technical problem. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check |
March 29th, 2009, 10:48 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 318
|
|
March 29th, 2009, 04:46 PM | #11 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 157
|
Why does overcrank 60 fps use up to 80 Mbs when 720/60p use 35 Mbps?
Does overcrank give a better image, frame by frame, or what? |
March 30th, 2009, 12:09 AM | #12 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
|
March 30th, 2009, 05:29 PM | #13 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
A good analogy would be building a house - if it costs £x to build a house, it will cost far less than 2x£x in building costs to build another of twice floor area. Overcrank is different - the end playback is 25fps, which should be at 35Mbs. Record 50frames in a second, and you have to record at 70Mbs to give the correct data rates for playback. |
|
| ||||||
|
|