|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 9th, 2009, 06:19 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
What is the difference between 720 60p and S&Q set to 60 frames?
I'm wondering what is the difference between recording in 720 60p and using S&Q set to 60 frames per second? I mean, 720 60p in a 24p timeline will be treated as slow motion anyways. The only advantage I can see for using S&Q at 60 frames is that you can review playback in camera in slow motion (or quick motion if under cranking). Am I missing something else? Thanks.
|
March 9th, 2009, 06:27 AM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
I think you get audio with one and not the other. And I also think with S&Q motion, you get more data rate, but I'd have to verify that.
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
March 9th, 2009, 06:51 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Yes audio, sure. I didn't consider that because I was talking from a slow and quick motion point of view and you never really record audio in these situations. But yes, if you need 60p to be played as 60p you may want audio and S&Q doesn't allow that.
The data rate detail is interesting. Looking forward to more on that. Thanks. |
March 9th, 2009, 08:08 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,124
|
In Final Cut Pro, when you drop 720 60p into a 24p timeline, it will conform the footage to 24p and throw away the additional frames. When you shoot 720 24p at S&Q 60fps, it will drop into the 24p timeline (but it is 24p) and play with the slow motion you're expecting.
Maybe different on a PC....dunno.....
__________________
Sony EX3, Canon 5D MkII, Chrosziel Matte Box, Sachtler tripod, Steadicam Flyer, Mac Pro, Apple/Adobe software - 20 years as a local videographer/editor |
March 9th, 2009, 09:04 AM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wales UK
Posts: 121
|
Edius 5 is yr best EX1/3 friend on PC and thats official
if u put 60p in to Edius time line it retains its correct frame rate thus plays properly on a 25p timeline thus making slowmos easy as anything. None of this throwing away frames business - Poor old FCP users
|
March 9th, 2009, 09:14 AM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
720p24/60 (overcrank) records at about 87.5mbps. 720p60 records at 35mbps.
Which do you think has more data per frame? Which do you think will look better slowed down to 24p? |
March 9th, 2009, 10:06 AM | #7 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,124
|
^^^^^^^I didn't know that. Thanks Craig! (how do you find out about this stuff?)
__________________
Sony EX3, Canon 5D MkII, Chrosziel Matte Box, Sachtler tripod, Steadicam Flyer, Mac Pro, Apple/Adobe software - 20 years as a local videographer/editor |
March 9th, 2009, 10:36 AM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
You'd think Sony would put this stuff in the manual.
Just a little math. XDCAM codec plays back at roughly 35mbps (it's VBR so it can vary a bit). That playback rate is regardless of record frame rate. 720p24 is 35mbps and 720p24/60 is 2.5 times more frames per second. Then 35mbps times 2.5 equals 87.5mbps. You can also test this physically. Using 8GB SxS card set camera to 720p24/60 and time how long it takes to fill the card (use a watch since the EX counter shows the playback rate not the record rate). Normally it takes about 28 minutes to fill the card. You'll find it'll take just under 11.5 minutes to fill the card. |
March 9th, 2009, 11:01 AM | #9 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kennewick, WA
Posts: 1,124
|
Impressive. You make it sound so simple. (I never would have thought of that).
Thanks again Craig.
__________________
Sony EX3, Canon 5D MkII, Chrosziel Matte Box, Sachtler tripod, Steadicam Flyer, Mac Pro, Apple/Adobe software - 20 years as a local videographer/editor |
March 9th, 2009, 02:53 PM | #10 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
|
Something is not quite adding up here. 60p is 60fps regardless of how it's played back, either you're recording 60 frames per second or you're not. I think the difference is that in S&Q the camera records I frames only.
|
March 9th, 2009, 03:02 PM | #11 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
It certainly adds up. Do the math.
We're talking about data rate playback per second of playback. That's how XDCAM codec decode works. 720p24, 720p60, 1080p30, etc. are all the same approximate data rate playback. The overcrank record is also flagged so it plays back at the data rate set in camera whether 24p, 25p, 30p. You can see this info in the metadata. As I said before, watch how fast the SxS card fills up. The data rate is much higher in overcrank record. One of the BIG differences between P2 DVCPro vs XDCAM is that DVCPro is per frame whereas XDCAM is per second regardless of frames. That's why you can shoot 720pn24 on a P2 card and get a longer record time than 1080p30. XDCAM playback data rate is per second, not per frame. |
March 9th, 2009, 05:51 PM | #12 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 9th, 2009, 05:54 PM | #13 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
I have never worked with 60p in FCP but I shot some 720 60p which was meant for slow motion yesterday. I hope I can get it to work in FCP. From now on though I will use S&Q 60 frames for slow motion instead of 720 60p. |
|
March 9th, 2009, 06:13 PM | #14 | ||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 9th, 2009, 07:11 PM | #15 | ||
Trustee
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,269
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
| ||||||
|
|