|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 9th, 2008, 01:01 PM | #16 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
So Steve, is it at "Gold" standard that the PDW700 is accepted and the other XDCam formats are not? I was sure that at one level at least the 700 was OK but not the other XDCams. Certainly BBC will accept PDW700 but not EX as a main camera.
Steve |
December 9th, 2008, 01:26 PM | #17 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
I would be editing in Adobe Premiere CS4, and I believe it handles XDCAM EX without rewrapping. (See http://www.adobe.com/products/premie...kflowguide.pdf) It's good to know that the EX3 has competent autofocus. However, I'd often need a longer lens than the one supplied, and I'm not sure what other lenses can do with the EX3 in terms of AF and autoexposure. |
|
December 9th, 2008, 01:28 PM | #18 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
Quote:
BTW Bronze at Discovery will give you 100% HDV AND Mastering to HDV! |
|
December 9th, 2008, 01:32 PM | #19 | |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
|
|
December 9th, 2008, 01:36 PM | #20 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I don't know where the PDW700 sits in Discovery's table, but XDCAM HD 4:2:0 and XDCAM EX are both Silver. Silver is allowed for 100% programme acquisition without any restrictions. Gold is HDCAM, HDCAM SR and 35mm film only. I don't know where the 700 will end up but as 100Mb DVCPRO HD is also Silver I would image that the 700 will end up as Silver.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
December 9th, 2008, 01:36 PM | #21 |
New Boot
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 9
|
|
December 9th, 2008, 01:51 PM | #22 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
If 100Mb DVCPro is Silver then that's "Planet Earth" firmly in Silver then, mostly Varicam!
Steve |
December 9th, 2008, 01:57 PM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Quite interesting article here In higher definition - The IET
Steve |
December 9th, 2008, 02:10 PM | #24 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
The aerials were all HDcam though weren't they?
|
December 9th, 2008, 02:42 PM | #25 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
|
|
December 9th, 2008, 02:43 PM | #26 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Sony 750s I think, presumably onto SR. Of course there wa plenty of S16 and 35mm in there too. And Varicam is still the default wildlife camera with BBC and others, even though it's only 720. There just isn't anything else out there that's more suited, though I bought a PDW700 thinking that with 1080 chips but also capable of 720/60P it might cover all bases. Only the 50 mbs compression looks a little vulnerable (and maybe 8 bit vs 10 bit processing), but apparently both of these have been deemed perfectly adequate.
Steve |
December 9th, 2008, 02:51 PM | #27 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Wales
Posts: 2,130
|
Marten, it's pretty typical these days just to leave the white balance on a fixed value and colour correct/match in post. Also is standby mode neccessary for the EX cameras? On tape cameras this is there to allow quick starts but requires the tape to be spooled up and the tape heads spinning, but it doesn't work like that with solid state.
Steve |
December 9th, 2008, 03:17 PM | #28 | |||||
Inner Circle
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 4,100
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There is certainly something to be said for having switches and dials and not menus to access many functions, but on a camera the size of the EX1/EX3, you really do run out of real estate. On a shoulder mount camera there is lots more room, and consequently more switches and dials. But then we get back to the "operational weakness" of the camera weighing 20+ pounds!
__________________
DVX100, PMW-EX1, Canon 550D, FigRig, Dell Octocore, Avid MC4/5, MB Looks, RedCineX, Matrox MX02 mini, GTech RAID, Edirol R-4, Senn. G2 Evo, Countryman, Moles and Lowels. |
|||||
December 9th, 2008, 03:32 PM | #29 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 640
|
If you want to have a program with your footage on Discovery, it means something. Otherwise it really isn't that significant as per your original questions in this thread. BTW. I don't have an EX1 or EX3. But I do have a lowly V1 that shoots only in HDV. I have shot some birds in flight (ducks & white pelicans) without any of the dreaded CMOS/rolling shutter/codec issues that others have mentioned. As a matter of fact, I filmed an airshow of WWII aircraft without any issues. And I have also taped the Blue Angels with the V1 and I have not had any horror stories to tell, either. I would think that the Blue Angels would be fast enough to bring out any shortcomings of CMOS chips, rolling shutters and long GOP codecs, especially with an obviously cheaper camera and lower quality format like the V1. |
December 9th, 2008, 03:49 PM | #30 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 61
|
Quote:
When I'm shooting outdoors the white balance changes quite often. I find it harder to correct the whitebalance in post than in camera. If my wb is off to much then it can be quite hard to get it right without loosing quality. |
|
| ||||||
|
|