|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 18th, 2008, 11:22 AM | #646 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
|
Quote:
|
|
October 18th, 2008, 03:54 PM | #647 | |
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,244
|
Quote:
Now it all makes sense. Much appreciated! |
|
October 18th, 2008, 04:13 PM | #648 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
|
Would be interested to hear how your set up goes - Im assuming you plan to use the 5dMkII footage to suppliment your EX1's. This was what I had in mind but not sure how well the canon footage at 30fps would integrate with the EX1 at? (do you shoot 24p?)
|
October 18th, 2008, 04:18 PM | #649 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Nikon D90 does 720p24
|
October 18th, 2008, 04:56 PM | #650 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 753
|
Quote:
most of my projects are 24p and 60p final product goes to Blu-Ray. |
|
October 18th, 2008, 08:00 PM | #651 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
Quote:
1) Can you shoot 1080 60i HQ to the SDHC cards? 2) Does use of the Kensington/SDHC require the v 1.1 firmware, or will it work with the preceeding firmware (v 1.05??) as well. Thanks
__________________
Bob |
|
October 18th, 2008, 08:20 PM | #652 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
|
Yes I know the D90 does 720 at 24 but from what Ive seen and heard the codec is horrid so it would stand out like dogs danglers compared to the pristine EX1 shots.
I know the canon isnt out yet but supposedly its codec is much cleaner, it does 1080 and has many other polished features in video mode that would make it a better choice. Then again it costs way more than the D90 so you would hope this to be the case. I just thought if footage from the canon could be intercut nicely with the EX1 (matching the frame rates) then you could cut in some amazing shallow DOF visuals with minimal fuss compared to using a letus rig or similar. |
October 18th, 2008, 08:34 PM | #653 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 174
|
Just one other concern with the SDHC option - what if sony decide to block this in a later firmware release? I know everyone would say simply dont upgrade the FW but what if its something you really need? Worse what if your camera breaks and needs to be serviced. Sony would be well within their right to refuse to service it unless the firmware was upgraded...? What if the upgrade was not reversible...?
I guess if you bought the EX1 budgeting in SxS before SDHC was an option then no biggie - but it your sole reason for buying was because SDHC suddenly made it an option then this would hurt big-time. Not trying to be a negative nancy here, just trying to work through all the pro's and Con's |
October 18th, 2008, 08:48 PM | #654 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Quote:
It does not seem to me canon will intercut seemlessly unless you use same lenses in front of EX1 (such as using 35mm adapter like LEX etc.) - which you seem to be trying to avoid... I already own some great Nikon lenses, so I'll wait till Nikon comes up with the second generation of video-capturing cams, I guess :) |
|
October 18th, 2008, 09:10 PM | #655 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Quote:
No, you need version 1.11 |
|
October 18th, 2008, 09:17 PM | #656 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Quote:
You're right, if you send it in they may upgrade the software. Having said that, they offered the USB over the expresscard slot to enable their new portable capture drive to work. If they disabled this access, they would render ALL of their PHU-60K drives already sold useless... not a smart move. I REALLY believe this is GREAT news for Sony! I've already spoke to several who are now considering buying the EX1 due to cheaper memory cards (SDHC). SxS easily raises the price a couple thousand dollars. If I were Sony, I would be working on their own expresscard adapter. I'd be willing to spend a "bit" more to be able to have Sony approved expresscards and close the dang EX1 memory door! lol Last edited by Steven Thomas; October 19th, 2008 at 09:34 AM. |
|
October 18th, 2008, 11:18 PM | #657 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coronado Island
Posts: 1,472
|
Steven
Thanks for your reply. RE: Sony- they may well be making much more profit from the sale of the SxS cards than they are from the camera. Hard to read their motives, but there is the iron law that memory always gets cheaper over time. They'll give in eventually.
__________________
Bob |
October 18th, 2008, 11:24 PM | #658 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Since SxS stands for Sony by Sandisk (at least what I've heard) and it's the latest technology, I'm not sure about the profit margin.
|
October 19th, 2008, 02:03 AM | #659 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Blocking the use of SDHC would also probably block the use of the PHU-60. I don't think Sony would do that.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
October 19th, 2008, 02:32 AM | #660 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dorset UK
Posts: 697
|
Spot on. I have now ordered 4 32Gb Ultra 11's with 4 Kensingtons. No need to touch the sdhc cards once they are in the kensingtons. Just leave them in there. That is more than ample for a full days wedding shoot. As soon as the cards arrive and I have done full testing, all buut one of my 16Gb and all my 8Gb SXS cards will be up for grabs on ebay.
|
| ||||||
|
|