|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 10th, 2008, 07:26 PM | #541 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
whoa that was scary.. couldn't get the ultra II to work, it wouldn't even format.. ran a test on the computer, all the read write speeds are way high... very good. over 17mbs on the first series of tests. Numbers were stable during the test.
Tried to format several times, powered down, switched slots... nothing. Then I tried my 2nd kensington reader... worked first time. Tried record in HQ and SP both worked. Guess I got a bum 7 in 1 reader. :( |
October 10th, 2008, 09:38 PM | #542 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,435
|
Erik - did you try IOC-9750? I posted a link (prob prev page now) for $8 cost + free shipping on it.
|
October 11th, 2008, 02:08 AM | #543 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Agua Blanca Ibiza
Posts: 305
|
Just to add that Transcend and Lexar SSD 8GB cards tested here, only suitable for SP recording, and sometimes not even that. Tread carefully with these, they may let you down when you least expect it. These two were tested with my EX1.
I've also finished testing Patriot 16Gb SDHC class 6 card - this is too slow and throws errors, even with HQ - avoid. Tested with Kensington adapter in my EX1 Paul
__________________
Another Sunny Day in Ibiza |
October 11th, 2008, 02:27 AM | #544 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 628
|
|
October 11th, 2008, 02:47 AM | #545 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
I have no backup HD camera although the place I bought the camera from might give me a loaner. I'm planing on driving to Teaneck but 3 weeks is ABSURD! BTW I'm not speaking from "the abstract." I'm a former Video Engineer at a big facility and used to deal with Teaneck regularly. They never took anything close to that long on anything.
Quote:
|
|
October 11th, 2008, 09:44 AM | #546 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Monroe, NY
Posts: 703
|
Quote:
John |
|
October 11th, 2008, 10:26 AM | #547 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Right now, the Kensington adapter is the best working solution for using SDHC cards in the EX1 and EX3.
At least until we find a working solution equal or better than the SDHC that allows the EX1 door to close. The Kensignton with SDHC is capable of overcranking 40FPS at 24P without an error in the EX. This overcrank is an equivalent of approx 8.3MB/s. We know the Kensington specs should offer the full SanDisk Ultra II 15MB/s data rate, but for "some reason", we are limited to 8.3MB/s. It would be nice to know if this bottleneck is the way Sony is using the USB Protocol (or they possibly intentionally crippled the USB datarate).? Or, is it a problem with the Kensington 7-in-1 expresscard adaptor? We can learn the answer to these questions with a USB 2.0 to USB Mode ExpressCard reader. The Sony expresscard reader is PCIe based and will not work with our USB based adaptor. Here's one USB 2.0 to USB Mode ExpressCard that would be nice to try: MicroU2E-MV USB 2.0 to USB Mode ExpressCard 34|54 Multi-Voltage Host Adapter, Synchrotech We could run the Crystal Disk Mark PC utility datarate memory tester on our SDHC. If we are able to get the 15MB/s sustained R/W datarates, we will know that the problem is with the way Sony is using the USB, or they intentionally crippled the USB datarate. This certainly will explain why their own USB PHU-60K drive barely works in HQ mode. It has lots of "restore media" errors and also explains why it's not fast enough to run S&Q modes. |
October 11th, 2008, 10:55 AM | #548 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 596
|
Let's chip in and send it to Steven for testing. $60 should cover the part plus shipping. I'll commit to $10 - anyone else?
Once we get the money committed, we can PayPal Steven and he can order it and the research can continue.
__________________
Sony EX3, Vegas 9.0 64bit, Windows 7(64), Core i7, 12GB, RAID1 & 0, HotSwap SATA, 30" LCD(2560x1600)-GTX285 & 24" LCD(1360x768)-7800GT |
October 11th, 2008, 11:08 AM | #549 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Quote:
I appreciate, but no need. I'm just wondering if someone might have a USB based expresscard reader in their laptop or PC that might want to run the Crystal Disk Mark datarate tests on the Kensington plus SDHC combo. |
|
October 11th, 2008, 11:13 AM | #550 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
Give me 30 mins. I have a laptop with both Express card slot and SD card slot. I'll do some tests.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
October 11th, 2008, 11:39 AM | #551 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Thanks Alister!
Here's a link to the free datarate tester: http://crystalmark.info/software/Cry...k/index-e.html |
October 11th, 2008, 12:21 PM | #552 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
Since the 65Mbs is an actual working speed, not a nominal manufacturers spec, I think there's grounds for optimism, but it should be an interesting test. |
|
October 11th, 2008, 12:29 PM | #553 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
OK ran some tests, pretty inconclusive, but here are my results, the last one is interesting:
Transcend 16Gb Class 6 card (also ran the tests with a 8Gb Extreme III, almost exactly the same results). 500Mb sequential file. In Kensington adapter via express card slot. Seq R19.37/W14.37 512k 19.22/2.54 4k 4.68/0.021 Via Sandisk USB adapter Seq 19.38/14.53 512k 19.22/1.92 4k 4.677/0.018 Via built-in SD card slot... This is the interesting one.. Seq 7.76/6.80 512k 7.65/1.69 4k 4.32/0.018 This was with a Sony NV11M laptop. Maybe they are using the same controller in the laptop as in the as the EX! From this test I would suggest that the Kensington card is not the bottleneck. By the way PHU-60 users have found that with a USB sex changer (sony use an odd USB connector on the express card adapter) they have been able to use generic USB hard drives. No matter how big the drive no one can get them to format above 80Gb. But still opens up the possibility of recording to cheap USB drives.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
October 11th, 2008, 12:45 PM | #554 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Thank you Alister!
This is good and bad news! This now concludes that the issue is with Sony's EX camera implementation of USB data control. OR, worst yet, they intentionally crippled the USB data rate! Sony, PLEASE fix the USB datarate problem. This may allow your own PHU-60K to not have "restore media" errors. Which we know are directly tied to datarate. We determined this by using slow SDHC cards in the Kensington reader. They also were infected with "restore media" errors. IMO, and many will agree, the ability to use SDHC cards is a breakthrough for Sony. This itself, will increase camera sales. Also, it will allow you to manufacture a better working SDHC card reader that will allow the EX1 memory door to close with the SDHC card inserted. |
October 11th, 2008, 01:16 PM | #555 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I also agree that Sony should support SD cards, they have everything to gain, after all, they will sell lots more EX's
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
| ||||||
|
|