|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 30th, 2008, 09:21 AM | #1 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Mxo2 = Woot
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 Last edited by Matt Davis; May 30th, 2008 at 10:53 AM. |
May 30th, 2008, 09:34 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 762
|
You're a man of few words, Matt. ;)
|
May 30th, 2008, 11:11 AM | #3 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
I don't want to spoil the moment, but...
- Downconvert in hardware
- SDI to MBP, record SD from HD - RT 720 to PAL/NTSC O/P - Upconvert in hardware - 720p60 to 1080p25 - Monitor on-screen in hardware - Work in ProRez - And it goes on. I've deleted my rant. A while back, I dumped an entire Avid suite and replaced it with an AJA IO and FCP. Suddenly everything worked, we could ingest and output BetaSP, work at 4:2:2 even from DV sources (ingest DV using S-Video using DV50 - hey, it looked nicer), even bring in the occasional digiBeta. We did great work with that suite after sweating some petty stuff before. Well, I feel like I'm sweating petty stuff again (or, more realistically, petting the sweaty stuff) in the SD-HD transition, and this box may well be the same enabler that the AJA was. Not to diss the new AJA box - it's just that the MXO2 is MBP sized, battery powered (sorta) and most importantly works with my EX1 rather than the Red I Do Not Have. There's only one point I'd have to draw attention to: the old MXO did not display fields correctly, so you couldn't spot field ordering problems on an LCD (an issue that's bitten me on the bum a couple of times - thank you LiveType). I hope the new MXO2 does what the Matrox cards did on the PC which is display field ordering problems by showing interlaced video at 50p. You can see problems then. And at the same time, get converted to shooting Progressive for data delivery.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
May 30th, 2008, 11:12 AM | #4 |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
I prefer the original message:
Nuff said.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
May 30th, 2008, 01:25 PM | #5 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 172
|
I see it says that it's a great solution for both MBP's and Mac Pro's. But does it work with iMacs?
|
May 30th, 2008, 01:37 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Utrecht, NL | Europe 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 612
|
|
May 30th, 2008, 02:03 PM | #7 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
May 30th, 2008, 02:57 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 172
|
Thanks George!
|
May 31st, 2008, 12:11 PM | #9 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28
|
Will this convert live uncompressed from the EX1 SDI to the MacBook Pro in ProRes for capture?
|
May 31st, 2008, 01:15 PM | #10 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
|
Quote:
Could do with one right now, in fact.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6 |
|
May 31st, 2008, 03:43 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
I was wondering about that too - as far as I can tell it's just passing the uncompressed signal through to the processor which then handles the compression in whatever format you want to use... that's where it differs from something like the IO which has prores in hardware. So I guess the real question is can a macbook pro do realtime prores encoding from uncompressed?
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
May 31st, 2008, 05:05 PM | #12 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
check out ...
Quote:
|
|
May 31st, 2008, 05:55 PM | #13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Belgium
Posts: 2,195
|
If I now convert HDV (from my Z1's, next to my EX1) to DVD, in Compressor, it can take a while. I remember rendering for 13 hours for a 2 hour show, in the preset Best Quality 120 minutes, on a Macbook Pro. How long would it take with such a card, would it improve speeds?
Or am I misunderstanding things? |
May 31st, 2008, 10:26 PM | #14 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
recording ...
Quote:
these are the specs. "Realtime hardware up/down/cross conversion Matrox MXO2 lets you deliver in any format your clients demand. The 10-bit hardware scaling provides high-quality mastering. HD to SD downscaling Matrox MXO2 provides realtime HD to SD downscaling so that you can monitor or record an SD master of your HD project in real time. Proper conversion of the HD color space to the SD color space and proper aspect ratio conversion to anamorphic, letterbox, and center cut are supported. SD to HD upscaling Matrox MXO2 provides realtime SD to HD upscaling with proper conversion of the SD color space to the HD color space. Cross conversion Matrox MXO2 offers realtime cross conversions from 720 to 1080 and 1080 to 720. Realtime frame rate conversion is also supported with the following cadences – 2:3:2:3, 2:3:3:2, and 2:2:2:4. This feature is useful if, for example, your source material is recorded at a different frame rate or resolution than the delivery format your client requires. It also facilitates monitoring when, for example, you need to work with 23.98 fps footage but your monitor does not support that frame rate. You can use MXO2’s realtime frame rate conversion to view your project at 29.97 fps." http://www.matrox.com/video/en/produ...o2/conversion/ |
|
June 1st, 2008, 01:45 AM | #15 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Utrecht, NL | Europe 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 612
|
Quote:
Your Compressor workflow would not gain any speed. George/ |
|
| ||||||
|
|