|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 14th, 2008, 03:56 PM | #61 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14th, 2008, 04:12 PM | #62 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Utrecht, NL | Europe 3rd Rock from the Sun
Posts: 612
|
You know, good things may come of this for all of us. We may finaly get to know if some of the issues are with the lens, the sensors or the firmware. All we needed was the EX3!
Much better to get Sony to fix the issues with existing EX1's than to mull over what could have been. Also, EX1's will be harder to get as Sony by it's own admission has a hard time keeping up with demand for the EX-es and the 3 uses alot of the same components. That ensures a good fair market value should you trade in an EX1. See, its all positive :) George/ P.S. Mark, very often introductions start at the higer end to capitalize and then features 'trickle' down to the common man, like me. |
April 14th, 2008, 04:12 PM | #63 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Zelienople, PA
Posts: 86
|
On the topic of Sony hiding the goods ...
(Please pardon the random nature of these comments, I’m about to go into a rant!) I always want one feature or another in my equipment and fortunately Sony is very good at finding what people want and then building that into their products. Every time I ever use a camera I say "I wish this camera had ..." and the next version of camera has that feature! It's great! So before you gripe, just be happy for what you have ... your EX1 is better than my Z1U! But regardless of the technical advancements there are creative minds that could run circles around both of us with a VX1000! Having the newest piece of equipment doesn’t make you good ... being good makes you good ... so use your EX1 to make something good! Yea yea, so maybe you would have paid the extra cash for an EX3 so you could have the interchangeable lens ... but would you have really used that feature? You do realize that a good 1/2" or prime lens is going to cost twice as much as the camera right? So if you have that kind of money to be buying those lenses than why are you complaining about having to buy the EX3? And if you want to talk price points ... look at your batteries ... they cost what? About $100 bucks each? Upgrade to a full size camera and you can pay $600 for your batteries and your lens (which won’t come with the body) will cost you another $12,000! These small cameras are the bee’s knees in whatever configuration! When I started my interest in media I was using single chip VHS-C cameras and editing on a 486 PC or a linear system! (Yea I know, if you’re older than me you where carving you video on stone tablets one frame at time!) That was 10-12 years ago and now we have all this awesome HD technology and stock laptops that can render 20 layers of HD video in real time ... and we can all give George Lucas a run for his money for under $15,000! That is of course, assuming that we learn how to actually use our equipment and not just complain about it or show it off. |
April 14th, 2008, 04:17 PM | #64 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
Since I like to distill things . . .
What it comes down to is if both the EX1 and EX3 had been available (or at least announced) at the same time, some number of people would gladly have spent a few more grand for the EX3. IMHO they are priced far enough apart that one has to consider whether one wants to pay a few more grand for the option to have interchangeable lenses . . . and then a few more grand to get those lenses. Alas only those CURRENTLY considering the two have that option. Those who bought the EX1 will now have to consider whether it's worth it to sell their EX1 and get the EX3. I think one problem that is peeving some is that some bought the EX1 many months ago but are FIRST getting a working version back from the Sony shop now. They've had no chance to do some business to cover some of the lose in value on the sale of the slightly used camera. I do NOT think one can call the EX3 a replacement of the EX1. It's not like with Panasonic where they went from DVX100 to DVX100a and then a longer pause, DVX100b. Those all seemed to be fixes for issues. Maybe I'm psychic or something but it seemed obvious to me at the time the EX1 was announced that an interchangeable lens with shoulder mount ability would be announced by NAB. It seemed plain as day to me that Sony would want BOTH options on the market ASAP. I posted as much on some threads. It seems this was less obvious to others though. I think the whole thing was even more obvious when Sony had both the Z7 and Z270 hitting the market. I'll say it real LOUDLY (although Sony won't) but I wouldn't be surprised if you see either and/or MPEG2 4:2:2 or 2/3" chip (think competition with Panasonic and Scarlet) by next NAB in the EX series. Will you be kicking yourself if you get the EX3 in August or September when 3 to 5 months later the EX5 is announced and delivered? |
April 14th, 2008, 04:18 PM | #65 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 383
|
I don't think losing this thread would be a bad thing at all, getting to be a real waste of bandwidth.
|
April 14th, 2008, 04:22 PM | #66 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
While I wouldn't want to lose it I think it's time for Chris to lock it.
It is an argument worth having but at this point all the "points" have been played. |
April 14th, 2008, 04:34 PM | #67 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amherst, NY
Posts: 100
|
I believe that waiting for NAB was simply a way to best reflect Cinealta's excitement of the product.
The most important point that everyone needs to keep in mind is that when the EX1 was announced, it *was* specifically announced as just the first of a new line. That indicates that we should anticipate incremental improvement. They didn't have to tell us that. |
April 14th, 2008, 04:45 PM | #68 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
I agree Mike.
As to marketing, if one is coming out with an entire new line, the spacing is going to be VERY TIGHT. That's why I wouldn't be surprised if a third camera EX camera is announced within months. Just as there's the F335 and F355, the third EX camera may be the equivalent of the PDW-700. If SxS XDCAM is going to be competitive to P2 DVCProHD it's all got to get out there FAST. Sony probably wants to match the P2 series from bottom to top. Quote:
|
|
April 14th, 2008, 04:59 PM | #69 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
But is the EX A new line? Whats new about it? from the XDCAMS? Its price portabilty and fixed lens? I disgree this is a new line The EX1 was the baby brother to the XDCAM Range. This new EX-3 is simply a better version of the EX-1 giving EX-1 users who are a new market for sony a better version of a product they wanted for years. Previously denied in favour of keeping the pro stuff for their pro lineup but with the advent of the RED upping the ante have given up a part to the indie community. My feeling is before commiting anything else to this errr range they will wait and see what Red and the market does next. One thing that is coming is a new improved XDCAM range that supercedes the EX Cameras. The next thing is if Jim Jannard doesnt succeed then Support for the EX cameras will go. My feeling is that Sony want to keep the Indie community happy and the Pro market. Keeping the RED at bay from all sides once thats achieved I think from what I have seen so far its goodbye to the EX range and the old Pro and consumer lines clearly drawn again. |
|
April 14th, 2008, 05:17 PM | #70 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amherst, NY
Posts: 100
|
Quote:
I tend to think that because of the quick development of trends in the market, new technology needs to be introduced as soon as possible and improvements developed afterwards in order to create momentum as soon as possible. |
|
April 14th, 2008, 05:23 PM | #71 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14th, 2008, 05:32 PM | #72 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amherst, NY
Posts: 100
|
Really good point. Now I can understand why that precedent had led you to believe that something like the EX3 would never happen even in light of the announcements at the time of the EX1's release. Fortunately the EX1 won't depreciate much over the next few months, in fact the demand may even increase now that everything about the EX3 has been revealed and those that have been fence-sitting on the EX1 will likely be content to buy it now.
|
April 14th, 2008, 05:55 PM | #73 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 762
|
Quote:
|
|
April 14th, 2008, 05:58 PM | #74 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Amherst, NY
Posts: 100
|
Congratulations!
|
April 14th, 2008, 06:28 PM | #75 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 762
|
Thanks Mike. It was a little nerve-wracking making that decision given the rash of problems this camera seems to have. I'm hoping that Sony either has most of the bugs ironed out OR that they will start issuing firmware patches that WE can apply.
Wish me luck. I'm going to get it Saturday! |
| ||||||
|
|