|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 16th, 2008, 04:36 PM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles CA USA
Posts: 507
|
Mac or PC laptop?
Hi folks
Just in general For the purposes of downloading SxS card content onto portable HDDs in the field only... A 17" MacBook Pro? Or something like an IBM T61? Both are quick, both have Expresscard slots. Pros and cons? Thanks! Cheers Chris
__________________
"The content, not the container." |
February 16th, 2008, 04:44 PM | #2 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Chris, I guess it mainly depends on what your main worksation is. If you're a Mac man, the choice is obvious.
I've always been on a PC, so my EX1 companion laptop is PC as well (the biggest and fastest Sony Vaio, btw.)
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
February 16th, 2008, 05:01 PM | #3 |
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 21
|
Chris,
I recently purchased a Dell Precision Mobile Workstation M90. Not cheap, but it is truly a mobile workstation, not a get-by laptop. It has an Express slot that I also use for an external SATA controller. Fast, reliable, durable. I think you can go either way and I agree that if your main machine is Mac then go with a Macbook. If your main is a PC then go with a PC laptop. I also have a dual xeon tower, but I also use the M90 as a workstation in the studio. |
February 16th, 2008, 05:39 PM | #4 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
Equipment ...
At this point many of us are committed to one working system and many have several machines to do the work. I'm a Mac person myself and in our set-up have 4 different Macs. It wouldn't be cost effective for us to go the microsoft route. If you are just organizing you systems, you have a great opportunity to really look at the differences in these computing systems and the software that they use. Keep the overall view in mind when you decide!
|
February 16th, 2008, 07:25 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles CA USA
Posts: 507
|
Umm... well...
I have four Macs and six PCs in my setup. They're all networked together. Some PCs are better for graphics. I edit Avid Media Composer on both platforms, AE on PC, Photoshop on PC, Corel on PC, Boujou on PC, Matchmover on PC, FCP Shake Color Magic Bullet etc on Mac. So?
__________________
"The content, not the container." |
February 16th, 2008, 08:15 PM | #6 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
An Intel Mac (MacBookPro) can run BOTH Windows and Mac OS with a simple reboot. With Parallels or VMWare Fusion it can run both Mac OS and Windows AT THE SAME TIME.
Get a MacBookPro and you have both as you need it. |
February 16th, 2008, 08:18 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los Angeles CA USA
Posts: 507
|
Craig
Thanks, that's the way I was sort of leaning - anybody know if there's any performance penalty or benefit one way or the other? Just had the fact that Sony makes PCs in the back of my mind, is all.
__________________
"The content, not the container." |
February 16th, 2008, 09:48 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
While if one Googles one can find piecemeal tests of Macs running Windows vs PCs running Windows but one has to get out one's head that it's a "Mac."
It's an Intel CPU PC with many components that are the same as found in a PC. Most of the tests I've seen show that it is comparable in speed to comparably equipped PCs. What makes the Macs different? Well they can run Mac OS too. Apple has a penchant for creative design and sometimes utilitarian too. There is no "con" to running Windows on a Mac directly ("bootcamp") unless you feel you can get a more feature rich faster PC for the money (and you might) but a Mac will give you a FAST make and a FAST Windows PC. If you use virtualization (Parallels or Fusion) then a Windows PC will likely be a bit faster. What virtualization does give you is the ability to move stuff from one OS to the other if there's a given app on a given OS you want to hand off something to. Otherwise "bootcamp" (boot as a Windows PC) to do Windows specific video work. |
February 17th, 2008, 12:43 AM | #9 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 513
|
I did a bit of research a while back and found some very interesting articles on this very topic of running XP on an Intel MacBook Pro.
http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2006/03...re_duo_laptop/ http://www.powerpage.org/2007/11/pc_...ta_laptop.html http://creativemac.digitalmedianet.c...e.jsp?id=39536 http://macanimationpro.digitalmedian...e.jsp?id=39724 Anyway, I edit on a PC and use the Adobe software. I haven't ordered it yet, but I'll be getting a MacBook Pro 17" The other thing for me was size. It will fit in my Kata backpack along with my camera. The backpack will fit in the overhead bin on an airliner and it frees up my hands while in the airport, etc. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc..._Backpack.html Hope this helps...
__________________
Reel Inspirations - www.reelinspirations.com Commercials, Dramas, Image Pieces, Documentaries, Motion Graphics |
February 17th, 2008, 04:50 AM | #10 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 462
|
I recently bought a very reasonably priced Dell Vostro 1400 that I am very happy with.
2.1 Ghz Core2Duo. 2 Gigs of ram 1440x900 resolution on 14" screen, dedicated Nvidia graphics card. Express card-slot. 7200 rpm 160 Gb drive. Pre-N wireless and bluetooth 2.0. It transfers an 8 GB card in 3,5 minutes to the internal 7200 rpm drive and plays back all HD-resolutions without hickups in Clip Manger AND to my big surprise I can edit 1080P HD with my Avid Media Composer on the machine. Weight 2,5 kg. Price €800. In essence I feel that a big workstation laptop is overkill for my needs. /ola |
| ||||||
|
|