|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 3rd, 2008, 12:43 AM | #1 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Desert, California
Posts: 311
|
I've Never Seen This Before - Blacks Too Black
This is real important and interesting so I hope I can explain it right. Just did some test shots - indoor with lights - still life stuff, using the High Sat matrix with Cine4. Remember with HDV you could never get the black deep enough and you always ended up in post doing that infamous "S" curve on levels? Well I got blacks at -10 and needed to do a REVERSE "S" curve to see any details in my blacks. What this means and what tinkering I need do I don't know yet - not enough experience - but it sure is interesting. Blew my mind when I looked at the Vector-scope and saw a dynamic range like I never ever seen before. Instead of trying to maximize dynamic range I was needing to shrink it! I'm really mind blown (or gob smacked if you are on the left side of the pond)..... Any comments welcome.
|
February 3rd, 2008, 05:42 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
|
Where was the scope?
|
February 3rd, 2008, 09:27 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Palm Desert, California
Posts: 311
|
I refer to the scopes in Sony Vegas when looking at the .mxf files. Incidentally, the shape of the histogram in Vegas is quite different from as shown on the LCD during shooting.
|
February 3rd, 2008, 10:04 AM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Yes, I've noticed this, too. And the Vegas histogram looks more realistic.
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
February 3rd, 2008, 02:03 PM | #5 |
Trustee
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,570
|
|
| ||||||
|
|