|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 13th, 2007, 08:25 AM | #16 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
I see what you're saying. It still looks OK to me, but I will try the same without detail on.
Even though the overall image was under exposed (due to the low lighting), there was a weak spot light in the ceiling just above the guitar. This is where the over exposed blurred highlights are coming from. It was a lot worse until I slightly closed down the aperture to bring back the blown out blurred highlights caused by the direct spot. |
December 13th, 2007, 09:08 AM | #17 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: canterbury
Posts: 411
|
Don't get me wrong, the original is fine but i think turning detail off turns the camera into an althogether different beast and the more 'off' shots i see the more im convinced by it.
I hope to pick one up next month (stock willing) cheers paul |
| ||||||
|
|