November 30th, 2007, 11:18 AM | #226 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 111
|
HI
I will give Sony a call to report the issue with my ex, is there a specific US phone number everyone is using? Thanks Chuck |
November 30th, 2007, 11:22 AM | #227 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Sony:
1-800-883-6817 Press 252 for direct dept. Talked again just now. Sony Japan is fully aware of the issue and is working on a solution. This is the best support I've ever witnessed from a company. They called me a couple times yesterday. |
November 30th, 2007, 11:33 AM | #228 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
When I tested my dealer's camera, who's also been a shooter, was surprised when it was happening at the "wrong" end of the zoom.
I suspect the reason that Sony is not getting more reports is that many may not know what to look for, recognize it as an anomaly, haven't had a reason to look for it or spotted it under "normal" use. Not everyone is hooked into these "boards." My dealer wouldn't have ever bothered to look for or notice it had I done the test and found a grey background to test against. |
November 30th, 2007, 03:23 PM | #229 | |
Major Player
|
Quote:
|
|
November 30th, 2007, 03:49 PM | #230 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Quote:
Please don't question others who you know NOTHING about. Most of us here are professionals. IMO (and many others agree), this forum is the best thing going. Chris keeps a tight control of his site and no doubt he offers the best professional atmosphere for us to share our thoughts and ideas in a constructive manner. I've been working for Nikon as a project owner for over 12 years. I clearly understand about illumination uniformity. No math is needed here, it's an obvious problem. We know the problem exists and so does Sony Corp. Again, I ask you to please not derail this thread with your speculation. The last thing we need is for Chris to close the thread due to ONE person. Again, I've been told directly fron Sony, they are reading this thread. Sony told me they have had reports world wide not just in the states. Last edited by Steven Thomas; November 30th, 2007 at 04:43 PM. |
|
November 30th, 2007, 04:45 PM | #232 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
I'm sorry Serena, you are well respected here, there's a lot of us concerned regarding this issue. We know of one who returned the camera for this issue.
|
November 30th, 2007, 04:57 PM | #233 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
Judging from the thread with posts from DVInfo sponsors, they don't seem to be aware of the issue.
Maybe some with orders from DVInfo sponsors can drop by the sponsoring dealers and check with their test/show cameras with someone of authority from the dealer. So many of us have now seen the issue and some have posted examples. My guess the dealers really aren't looking that closely or at all for issues like this. If the dealers spot it, it might signify to them and Sony how widespread this actually is. |
November 30th, 2007, 08:31 PM | #234 |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
|
Just tested a dealers promo of the EX-1 today. Very nice camera in many many ways but yes it was there. I didn't check it in anything but a low lit room looking at a white wall with iris fully open. I can't remember how much I varied the focus. Much worse with steady shot on.
Definite vignetting on the upper and lower right of the image to a lesser extent the right as well. Weird that it is not there at fully wide zoom. Seemed to arrive around 8mm and continue to get worse by 15 or so and remained there till at least 25. Its a problem in any otherwise very very nice camera. Who am i supposed to complain to again? I'm ready to buy aside from this. Lenny Levy |
November 30th, 2007, 08:34 PM | #235 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
I'm confident Sony will come up with a solution.
I imagine all the affected cameras will have to be sent in. It sounds something like what JVC had to do with the HD100 split screen issue. |
December 1st, 2007, 01:42 PM | #236 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Girard, Ohio
Posts: 103
|
Sorry, problem posting.
|
December 1st, 2007, 01:43 PM | #237 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Girard, Ohio
Posts: 103
|
Another Vignette Test
Has anyone gathered info on the vignette issue showing the f-stop where it clears up? For example, if you find the worse case situation with the zoom and then start closing down the iris, where does the problem disappear.
|
December 1st, 2007, 02:01 PM | #238 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
Robert, I have not, but this would be good information.
I believe we've all been checking at wide open 1.9 |
December 1st, 2007, 02:13 PM | #239 |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 128
|
|
December 1st, 2007, 02:39 PM | #240 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Girard, Ohio
Posts: 103
|
|
| ||||||
|
|