|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 27th, 2007, 10:12 PM | #46 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
I'm seeing absolutely none of what you mentioned.
Actually the EX1 1080 30P has the most natural look out of the frame stills. I've seen you make this reference before. IMO, these are not good examples for the other cameras. The EX1 1080 30P is in a COMPLETELY different league. It has FAR less noise and artifical detail and ton a lot more detail. I'm not finding this image below subjective, that's for sure. Woops meant to write: HVX200 on left, EX1 on Right http://members.cox.net/vx2000/HVX200_EX1_Bottle.bmp Last edited by Steven Thomas; November 28th, 2007 at 08:43 AM. |
November 27th, 2007, 11:07 PM | #47 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 1,719
|
Quote:
|
|
November 27th, 2007, 11:46 PM | #48 |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,259
|
Thomas,
You may well be right about ClearVid's pixel strategy not being used on the EX1. Reading up on it, it has an Exmor sensor. Which may or may not (I can't find out for certain) use the ClearVid pattern. |
November 27th, 2007, 11:53 PM | #49 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Recanting my post. I had the HVX image and the EX image mixed up. Ignore me, sorry.
|
November 28th, 2007, 12:39 AM | #50 | |
Trustee
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,259
|
Quote:
Look at the Rasta shot at 30P for the G1 and the EX. To me the G1 looks more natural and less plastic. Perhaps it's due to the highlights being hotter, which actually adds some extra depth. |
|
November 28th, 2007, 08:48 AM | #51 |
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,896
|
My bad for posting the HVX / EX1 bitmap.
You are right that the G1 and EX1 both look good. If you think the G1 looks better, than that's great. The G1 is a an excellent camera. |
| ||||||
|
|