|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
November 8th, 2007, 08:45 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT.
Posts: 58
|
It's no 900R but...
I am growing tired of lugging cases of gear around the world and the related headaches when dealing with unscrupulous customs agents. So, as my first official post on this board, may I pose this question. Do my fellow DP/Videographers see this camera as a solution to working abroad when trying to travel with a "lower" profile? I am really excited by the promise that this camera may hold (DOF issues aside). For me, this camera would be used to shoot a news magazine style program that is currently delivered in SD. We are an Avid shop so editing should not be an issue. I apprreciate your thoughts and any insights.
|
November 8th, 2007, 09:26 AM | #2 |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: monroe, or
Posts: 572
|
|
November 8th, 2007, 09:56 AM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
And the camera includes the ability to see such 4:3 guides on the LCD and it's what all HD production do for broadcast today.
While HD is not yet in the majority of households, any broadcast production with an eye towards longevity (syndication, etc) is shooting HD. The EX1 does have the ability output SD on SDI but that may not be relevant to most field production though. |
November 8th, 2007, 10:01 AM | #4 | |
Major Player
Join Date: May 2005
Location: monroe, or
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
This may have been asked and answered elsewhere, but is the SD/SDI output switchable between crop and letterboxed? That may be a good bit of info for Dave's situation. |
|
November 8th, 2007, 04:03 PM | #5 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 146
|
Quote:
vince |
|
November 8th, 2007, 04:26 PM | #6 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kelowna BC Canada
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
Not that this is any indication of gear quality but I bet you anything that within weeks of its release the EX1 will be used for some indy feature out there... yeah, it shoots 24 fps. :-)
__________________
www.ascentfilms.com |
|
November 8th, 2007, 04:54 PM | #7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 696
|
I have traveled the world for the past 2 years shooting with a Z1. I will be placing my order for an EX1 this week.
It is the perfect camera for travel shooting. It is getting harder these days to shoot with a big field camera. It is a sacrifice to use a smaller camera, but with the EX1 I don't think that I will be sacrificing much at all!!! Dan Weber |
November 11th, 2007, 07:16 PM | #8 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
I have the same concerns ...
Quote:
|
|
November 11th, 2007, 07:38 PM | #9 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 696
|
Quote:
I am in the same situation as you and have been using a Z1 since it came out. I have taken it in and out of over 25 countries during that time. I have an EX1 on order and can't wait to move up in quality from the Z1. I am very certain that 100% of all customs officials can't tell the difference between an HVX200 and an EX1. To them it is a camera. I find that the type of case you put the camera in is more of an issue. i now use a Portabrace Run Bag and my Z1 fits in perfectly in the middle and is very well protected. I then carry the bag on the plane and don't have any issues. I would put more of an effort into the different codecs and workflows between the HVX200 and the EX1 and not so much on what customs officials think of the cameras. If you use any of the smaller cameras you have a major advantage in getting in and out of countries than you would with a full size camera. Good discussion though. If I could I would use a full size camera (probably an F355), but for what I do and more importantly where i go, I need to use smaller cameras. That is why I am excited about the EX1. Daniel Weber |
|
November 24th, 2007, 04:58 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Novato, CA, USA
Posts: 46
|
Making a stolen camera a "brick"
One thing that would be nice for those of us that have to travel with our gear would be to have a mode where the camera requires a password/PIN in order to function at all, so that if the camera is stolen (or "accidentally misplaced" by officials) then it becomes a brick without the unlock code. To unlock a camera that has a code that you forgot, you would have to send it in to the manufacturer where they would verify ownership of the particular unit based on something like serial number.
Mike
__________________
Never give up! Never surrender! |
November 24th, 2007, 05:47 PM | #11 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 898
|
security ...
unlock code is a good idea!
|
November 24th, 2007, 07:52 PM | #12 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Hollywood, Atlanta
Posts: 437
|
unlock code
I agree. Send that to Sony, wait no, every expensive camera should have something like that. Thieves will eventually learn they cant steal cameras. The world will be a better place.
__________________
Tyson X |
| ||||||
|
|