|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 24th, 2007, 06:24 AM | #46 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 25
|
Ex Mattbox
Does anybody know what make of mattbox is being used on the ex in this video- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCw9GldVNI8
|
October 24th, 2007, 07:52 AM | #47 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 68
|
EX Mattebox
Hello, the mattebox did you see in this youtube video, is from Vocas, you can identify this, from the blue sticker attached left from the mattebox.
Alessandro Zumstein |
October 24th, 2007, 12:35 PM | #48 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 25
|
[QUOTE=Alessandro Zumstein;763792]Hello, the mattebox did you see in this youtube video, is from Vocas, you can identify this, from the blue sticker attached left from the mattebox.
Great, thanks Alessandro |
November 13th, 2007, 05:40 AM | #49 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
Anybody who actually seen a real camera + (Vocas, Cavision, TLS, etc..) mattebox can say something about REAL usability of grad filters?
|
November 13th, 2007, 06:35 AM | #50 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: France
Posts: 578
|
Hi Alvise,
I use a TLS mattebox on my Z1. I find the use of ND grads and polariser virtually essential for shooting nicely exposed scenic shots. I use Schneider Trupol and Tiffen 0.9ND on most of this type of shot. Latitude with these small cameras is extremely limited and while often you can see a nice blue sky and fluffy white clouds, it just comes out as a white space on video... I find the grads and polariser help you get a better balance and bring out what your eyes can see in the shot. Cheers Gareth |
November 13th, 2007, 09:57 AM | #51 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Milan/Italy
Posts: 63
|
Hi Gareth.
I was asking if and how much we can move vertically a grad filter on an EX, especially on an EX (there's a problem with the built in mic/lcd interferring with the EX lens end....where a mattebox has to be). |
November 13th, 2007, 06:09 PM | #52 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 873
|
The Cavision grads were noticeable on the JVC HD101E (ie the particles weren't fine enough for HD) so with the extra resolution of the EX I think they would be unsuitable. I think the Formatt filters they sell are better quality, but more expensive. The Cavision mattebox is OK, but from all reports the Chroziel is more solid.
|
| ||||||
|
|