|
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
|
Why does the EX encode 1440x1080 24P like this?
Newbie question.
Judging by the Australian literature the SP mode encodes the 23.98 within a interlaced stream that requires pulldown? Why does the camera do this when presumably the 1920x1080p24 mode is recorded natively to the SxS cards. Is it to do with getting the stuff off over Firewire? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wrangler
|
It uses progressive segmented frame which does not require pulldown. The progressive image is broken into two fields with no time differential so they can pass through the same signal chain that handles interlaced material. On output, the two fields are re-assembled into a true progressive frame.
-gb- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
1. According to the brochure, there is no 24p in SP mode. 2. The brochure lists PAL and NTSC as separate modes. Am I safe to assume that the camera released in the U.S. is going to be identical to the camrera released in Austrlia? I ask because The V1U had 24p but the V1P didn't. I'm wondering whether the Austrlian (or PAL in general) release of this camera will remove the 24p capability and therefore the CineAlta badge? Attached is the part from the brochure that addresses this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
|
What th Aussie brochure says (in multiple places) is:
"*In 1440 x 1080/23.98P (SP) mode, images are handled as 23.98P and recorded as 59.94i signals through means of 2-3 pull-down." So... I guess (and the Sony copy could have been worded better): 1. Full XDCAM HD 1080p24 1920x1080 is recorded as the progressive segmented frame. No pulldown required and will need to be transfered to computer visa card or SDI. 2. SP 1080p24 1440x1080 is recorded in an interlaced stream and will require pulldown (but can be transferred to computer by Firewire). Like the V1U |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
When you say 1920x1080 24p must be captured via card or SDI, I assume you are referring to the SxS card? Or do you mean something else? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 278
|
John,
The brochure download is in the sticky at the head of this forum. Vaughan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
That's the brochure I saw. It does not say in the specs at the end that the recording modes include 1920x1080 24p in SD mode.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
EDIT: Just re-read it and it does indeed look like they are using pulldown to 60i. That's a bit of a shame because it doesn't increase record capacity when shooting 24P. -gb- |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
|
agre 100% about the non "native" frame recording (ie using pulldown) and its lack of efficiency.
As for teh PAL model shooting 24p (as opposed to 25p) the transport stream itself needs to be able to handle the math.. u cant get 25p from 60i unless ur messing with it in post. One other thing, and i believe this is the fundamental reason why 25p is not supported, is due to the fact that BluePrint (the BluRay MPG standard) does NOT support 25p, it only supports 24p. Also, 1440x1080 is NOT supported either, in turn scaling up or a shift in the Aspect is required. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
Quote:
Consequently (unlike interlace) conversion between psf and progressive is simply a matter of reordering lines - not scaling or deinterlacing etc. For 23.98p, the psf variant is delivered over 60i (so needs pulldown), whereas for 25p, 25psf is delivered over 50i, so no pulldown is needed. The reasoning is that to a display it presents the same appearance as an interlace signal, and hence is compatible. Better displays should detect that it is psf, not interlace, and treat it accordingly. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 735
|
Quote:
It's confused the heck out of me. Is it possible to shoot 24p (or 25p) 1920x1080 footage to an SxS card and then simply drag it to the PC as a file? I don't need to capture live via SDI do I? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 4,086
|
Quote:
Do you know of any "better display" device model that will recognize the 25PsF properly?
__________________
Sony PXW-FS7 | DaVinci Resolve Studio; Magix Vegas Pro; i7-5960X CPU; 64 GB RAM; 2x GTX 1080 8GB GPU; Decklink 4K Extreme 12G; 4x 3TB WD Black in RAID 0; 1TB M.2 NVMe cache drive |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,699
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
|
<snip> Is it possible to shoot 24p (or 25p) 1920x1080 footage to an SxS card and then simply drag it to the PC as a file?
Yes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Wrangler
|
Here's a good document that explains all this stuff.
http://www.leitch.com/resources/whit.../Whatis24P.pdf -gb- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||
|
|