|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 12th, 2007, 09:20 PM | #16 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
September 13th, 2007, 01:19 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
You can plug the camera in via firewire and it too will behave as a card reader. As well as the sony transfer app there will also be a new "Log and Transfer" function in FCP that will allow you to import EX1 clips from within FCP. Log and Transfer dosn't allow you to view previews of the clips, make clip lists or partial clip import only import of selected clips.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 13th, 2007, 11:48 AM | #18 |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
the new version of XDCAM Transfer that is due to be released either before or in conjunction with the EX1 promises to allow editing of the metadata in the transfer app ... i'm hoping this translates to an all round robust improvement to XDCAM Transfer that enables its latent logging capabilies
ok ... and here i'm about to veer off into la la land, but was there some info about resuming recoding of a previously recorded clip, so that it extends the long GOP structure of the original clip rather than creates a new clip on the disc? if that were the case one could record an entire disc as a single clip and allow muliple shots to be imported as single (sub)clips ... this may have been an altogether different camera or i may have just dreamt it. |
September 13th, 2007, 12:22 PM | #19 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
September 13th, 2007, 10:02 PM | #20 |
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 795
|
If you are going to edit native XDCAM FW800 should be more than enough. 800 megabits = 100 Megabytes per second. I believe seagate's latest 750GB SATA drive can sustain almost 60 Megabytes/second - so a two disc array should be able to max out the FW800 bus. Even that may be overkill - 35 megabits per second works out to about 4.5 Mb/second, so five simultaneous streams is only about 23Mb/second - well within the speed limits of a single drive. At that point your processor becomes the limiting factor anyway, not your drive speed - it takes a lot of processing power to decode mpeg2 - so the main difference between a laptop and desktop will be in the number of real-time streams and effects they can play.
__________________
My latest short documentary: "Four Pauls: Bring the Hat Back!" |
September 13th, 2007, 10:36 PM | #21 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
Quote:
I wonder if that will be something that can/will be enabled on the 330/350's. Would make a lot of folks not keen on hundereds of clips in their projects very happy! With a bit of a tweak to XDCAM Select (Edius), XDCAM Transfer (Mac) etc etc it would make for a killer workflow. |
|
September 14th, 2007, 12:47 AM | #22 |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 352
|
|
September 14th, 2007, 01:08 AM | #23 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bracknell, Berkshire, UK
Posts: 4,957
|
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see the F350/F330 have it added in a firmware update.
__________________
Alister Chapman, Film-Maker/Stormchaser http://www.xdcam-user.com/alisters-blog/ My XDCAM site and blog. http://www.hurricane-rig.com |
September 14th, 2007, 06:25 AM | #24 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
There are some planned firmware upgrades to the F350, can't remember if this was one of them though. -gb- |
|
September 14th, 2007, 09:38 AM | #25 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USVI
Posts: 232
|
I like individual clips too
Thanks guys. I thought I was conjuring up all kinds of frustration for no reason.
I really am looking forward to this cam. I feel like a little kid and wonder how emotion driven this purchase is for me sometimes. I find I continually have to remind myself that it's a tool I use to make money.... as well as have fun and it can't get much better than that :) I am looking forward to the DOF control and the more "organic look" as the ex picture has been desctibed. I really hope the low light is as good as that reviewer mentioned... major bonus. All the best to all! Mike |
September 14th, 2007, 10:19 AM | #26 | |
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 645
|
Quote:
my think is simply that XDCAM Transfer "imports" clips ... its data transfer, nothing more (except some meta data manipulation and a bit of file rewrapping). if it were required to create a single clip from an arbitrary clip list then it would in have to conform that concatenated data to a single clip / Long GOP structure ... all of a sudden imports would take as long as exports!! I don't necessarily always want a single clip in the NLE either. But if I have the option to set the camera to expand existing clips when recording, instead of creating a new one each time (preferably keeping mutiple essence marks for easy navigation), then on import i can subclip as I choose, just as i do now with long interview clips, or as I would if I was log and capturing from tape. Currently XDCAM Transfer is limited in that it doesn't let you mark and import a single subclip or selection of subclips from a single clip where multiple subclips are marked, instead it imports all marked subclips from that clip everytime you press import ... if Sony allowed us to import single or selected subclips then we'd have a workflow we could use. Just my thoughts ... and how I'd make it work for me if I could! |
|
September 14th, 2007, 11:00 AM | #27 | |
Wrangler
|
Quote:
-gb- |
|
| ||||||
|
|