|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 19th, 2005, 01:11 AM | #1 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tempe, Az
Posts: 172
|
PD170/how to soften focus behind subject being interviewed...
The setting:
single camera positioned slightly left or slightly right of interviewer. single 2k light with softbox. at subjects home, typical room dimensions(average12' x 15'). Is there any way to manipulate the PD170 to narrow its depth of field and soften the focus behind the subject ?
__________________
Mediocrity is a disease... |
February 19th, 2005, 04:17 AM | #2 |
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gwaelod-y-garth, Cardiff, CYMRU/WALES
Posts: 1,215
|
Get the camera as far back as possible and tighten the shot with the zoom; reduce the intensity of the light or change your shutter speed to 1/100th or higher. You need to be working with the lens aperture wide open...
Robin |
February 19th, 2005, 08:06 PM | #3 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 3,841
|
go to F1.6. Add ND filters if you're overexposed. Up the shutter speed if you still need to cut light (as Robin mentions). Get back as far as you can and zoom in as much as possible. If you have to cut light I'd think about cutting some light from the 2k before doing the other things mentioned above though but it depends on the look your after.
|
February 19th, 2005, 08:38 PM | #4 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 3,840
|
Two other options, someone makes a 'soft focus' scrim that you can hang behind a subject, sort of difuses the background... not sure that's practical, and kind of expensive.
Second option, create a mask around the subject in post, put a very slight gaussian blur on the background.... VERY slight. This will fool the eye a bit. |
February 19th, 2005, 09:30 PM | #5 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Shoot through an open window if the weather is OK. Or an interior door way.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
February 20th, 2005, 06:02 PM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Northridge Ca
Posts: 734
|
That 2K in the softbox is way overkill, Ken. Assuming you are shooting your subject in a nice bust sized shot, you should be able to get away with a 500w light in your softbox, unless you are using a Chimera with an interior baffle, which may require a 750. Certainly, no more than a 1K. To get the best soft, wrap around look out of your softbox, you want to position the light as close to your subject as possible. With a 2K you'll be burning him up at close range.
That "soft focus" scrim can be found here: http://indietoolbox.com/ Wayne Orr, SOC |
February 20th, 2005, 07:02 PM | #7 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tempe, Az
Posts: 172
|
Appreciate the great response.
I stand corrected on the light. It was a 500 watt. The last interview shoot was done in the home of a well known musician and my partner borrowed a less watt light and softbox special. That soft focus screen would have been ideal for that mornings shoot. Thanks for the link.
__________________
Mediocrity is a disease... |
February 22nd, 2005, 02:24 PM | #8 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Trouble is that f2.5 is top whack Craig, much as we'd all like to use f1.6 at full telephoto.
|
| ||||||
|
|