|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 3rd, 2003, 11:11 PM | #1 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
VX-2100 test shots vs PD150
http://www.videoproductionbiz.com/videobiznews.html
is the site
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
December 4th, 2003, 12:15 AM | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA (travel frequently)
Posts: 837
|
Thank you for the heads-up Mike!
+18db? Yikes! - don
__________________
DONALD BERUBE - noisybrain. Productions, LLC Director Of Photography/ Producer/ Consultant http://noisybrain.com/donbio.html CREATE and NETWORK with http://www.bosfcpug.org and also http://fcpugnetwork.org |
December 4th, 2003, 03:53 AM | #3 |
Major Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 804
|
Mike, did you compare resolution (spatial and temporal) at +18db. As you know, limiting bandwidth and applying some frame averaging can in combination with coring, drastically reduce subjective noise effects and allow more initial gain, ending up in a brighter image.
|
December 4th, 2003, 01:06 PM | #4 |
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vallejo, California
Posts: 4,049
|
Sorry, should have made it clear that it is not my camera nor test.
__________________
Mike Rehmus Hey, I can see the carrot at the end of the tunnel! |
December 9th, 2003, 08:53 PM | #5 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 209
|
So, I take it that the PD-170 will have the same results as the Vx2100 shown above?
|
| ||||||
|
|