|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
September 5th, 2001, 11:58 PM | #1 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Where to buy the VX2000, PD150 or DSR250
Howdy from Texas,
A question I get asked a lot is, "where is the best place to buy a (insert camera here)?" The answer is, the place which will give you an honest deal with great service, and not rip you off by suckering you in with ridiculously low prices and then pulling the old bait-and-switch. I'm working with several of my sponsors on a DV Buyer's Guide to avoid rip-offs. For now, though, I recommend that you deal only through my sponsor, ProMax. Their prices are *realistic* and their reputation is among the best you'll find anywhere. Hope this helps, |
September 17th, 2001, 03:45 PM | #2 |
Posts: n/a
|
comparison
Help! In your opinion which is better the xls1 or vx2000 . I can't decide.
|
September 17th, 2001, 08:46 PM | #3 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
Well, in my opinion, a true "comparison" between these two particular cameras is almost pointless, because they're so different from each other.
One is a handycam with a flip-out LCD screen and the other is a hybrid, modular design with interchangeable components. The biggest difference, however, is the image; the video they record. One is "the Canon look" and the other is "the Sony look." Each has its own legion of devoted camp followers who swear by one or the other. The way you choose between these two camcorders is to ask yourself: which particular form factor do you need (handycam or shoulder mount), and what kind of look do you want your video to have. Only hands-on and eyes-on experience will show you what you need to know, so test-drive each before you make a decision. Regardless of what zealous fans of either the VX2000 or the XL1S will tell you, the simple truth is that neither is clearly better than the other. They are simply different from each other , in many ways. Only your particular shooting requirements and your critical eye can make this determination for you. If at all possible, try before you buy. Hope this helps, |
October 19th, 2001, 04:26 PM | #4 |
Posts: n/a
|
vx2ooo or pd150
whats the notable differences between the vx2000 or the pd150 help
|
October 19th, 2001, 11:55 PM | #5 |
Obstreperous Rex
|
See the page called "The Skinny" on the VX2000 Companion website at http://www.dvinfo.net/vx2000.htm -- the differences are all clearly spelled out in the chart on that page.
Primary differences: VX2000 records DV, has a built-in stereo microphone. PD150 records DVCAM, has XLR microphone inputs. VX2000 is silver, PD150 is black. Not much difference otherwise. Main difference is recording format. Again, see the chart on the page mentioned above for a full explanation. Hope this helps, |
December 1st, 2001, 07:42 AM | #6 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 888
|
Chris the XL1s shoots in DVCam doesn't it? Still trying to decide on the camera I'll buy really leaning this way.
|
December 2nd, 2001, 11:04 AM | #7 |
Posts: n/a
|
pd100 question
XL1s records in the miniDV format
im looking for a camera to compliment my pc110 which i use with .3xultra ive been looking at the vx2000 or the pd100 or pd150 i dont believe the pd100 has interval record function does anyone know this and will a dvcam and a minidv tape mesh well |
December 2nd, 2001, 06:43 PM | #8 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Frisco, Tx
Posts: 85
|
VX2000 vs. pd150
Unless you really need to shoot a DVCam format, go with the VX2000. Same camera minus the XLR inputs and shoots only MiniDV.
The extra dollars go a long way for additional goodies like an XLR adapter, better mic, WA lens, batteries, case, etc. you get the idea. Never have understood why the 2k is considered "prosumer" and the 150 a preofessional model (guess just the format thing) WG |
December 7th, 2001, 04:40 PM | #9 |
Hawaiian Shirt Mogul
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: northern cailfornia
Posts: 1,261
|
vx2k pd 150
<Never have understood why the 2k is considered "prosumer" <and the 150 a preofessional model (guess just the format thing)
sony considers 150 professional ..that why they fixed the HISS on it and did NOTHING to the 2000 ... if you are shooting and you NEED good audio without HISS ..it's worth ? ...to me what it cost for pd150 ... ( using a separate audio recorder is a PAIN ) ... the 150 has : better audio : woth extra $$ REAL smpte time code : worth extra $$ to many smpte color bars : worth $$ to many dvcam : worth $$ to many ( not to me) B&W viewfinder ..many prefer it over color .. XLR inputs with phantom power : worth $$ to those that use pro mic's and mic's that need phantom power ..yes you can add some of the above to the vx 2000 and as you add the extra costs the price difference gets smaller ... xlr box @200 .... smpte color bar generator @200 ..phantom power @165 ... MD recorder @200 or dat @700 .... it all comes down to how much would you use/need the extra features that come with the pd 150 ... for me there is NO choice 150 wins ..but for others the 2000 wins ... |
January 5th, 2002, 04:35 PM | #10 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brandon, Ms 39042 USA
Posts: 159
|
White Balance and the PD150
On a two camera shoot the PD150 is the second camera and the main camera DSR 500 is the main camera. Due to the shot and the inexperience of the shooter the PD 150 needs to be in auto focus and auto iris. However, in an attempt to match cameras
the white balance needs to be on manual. Is there a way to use manual white balance and at the same time have auto focus and auto Iris ??? The 500 is used in more of the wide shots and the 150 more close up as a cutaway to hide camera moves of the 500. Although the 150 is no "match" for the 500 it really does a remarkable job. It appears a bit more warm and not as sharp. I think if I could get the manual white balance to work while shooting auto iris and auto focus I would have a better match. Thanks Ronnie Martin Kato Video
__________________
Ronnie Martin Kato Video |
January 9th, 2002, 06:50 PM | #11 |
Machinist Mate
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern Connecticut
Posts: 644
|
Hmmmm....Handycam or shoulder mount?
I submit that the XL1 is neither. OK, I love my XL but can't stand shooting portable without a shoulder pod because all the weight is forward. I used to shoot an old Panasonic S-VHS box that weighed a whole lot more but felt OK because the weight was truly on your shoulder. That is why I would love to demo a JVC GY-DV500. If it performs to a level worth the cost, it will be a pleasure returning to a true "over-the-shoulder" form factor....and a real rack-focusable lens. Meanwhile I continue to baffle corporate America with smoke and mirrors whilst shooting my XL on a heavily modified Vanguard shoulder pod or on my Bogen sticks and absurdly overbuilt Quickset dolly.
__________________
I ain't straight outta Compton, I'm straight out the trailer. Cuss like a sailor, drink like a Mc. My only words of wisdom are just, "Radio Edit." |
January 10th, 2002, 12:55 AM | #12 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 182
|
While I don't have that cam, if it's built the way it should be, and sony knows how, I'd say yes.
On my canon, there are three (manual) white balance presets beside the auto, daylight and tungsten. There is a full auto mode which won't allow overrides, but only one setting like that. I don't think you'll have any problem. No problems with changing shooting and lens modes, etc. But I haven't tested the white balance with different presets in 0, +6, +12, +18, +30 gain settings. That is where I might believe the white balance could shift a bit as there is perhaps some color to the noise when gain is applied.
__________________
< >< . . . . . < >< . . . . . < >< |
January 18th, 2002, 06:03 PM | #13 |
Posts: n/a
|
Use the small preset button options near the top of the cam.
|
February 3rd, 2002, 12:47 AM | #14 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 355
|
<<<-- Originally posted by Chris Hurd : Primary differences: VX2000 records DV, has a built-in stereo microphone. PD150 records DVCAM, has XLR microphone inputs. VX2000 is silver, PD150 is black. Not much difference otherwise. Main difference is recording format. -->>>
Chris, To me, besides the faster writing speed (and resulting video quality) of DVCAM, the big edge the PD150 has over most other cameras in the price range is programmable SMPTE time code. This may be of no importance to most but for commercial purposes it's a great feaure - one I wish the XL-1s had. Add tc and the XL-1s would be very near perfect. After all, the PD150 lacks interchangeable lenses. |
April 4th, 2002, 01:02 PM | #15 |
Sponsor: ZGC
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mountain Lakes, New Jersey
Posts: 56
|
P+S Technik Mini 35 Digital Adapter for PD150
The brand new P+S Technik Mini 35 Digital Adapter for the Sony PD150 will be shown for the first time at NAB in Las Vegas, April 8 through 11, Booth #L9557 (OpTex section of the Tiffen booth).
Come and see the demonstration.
__________________
Barbara Lowry ZGC, Inc. Watchdog Sponsor |
| ||||||
|
|