May 24th, 2006, 06:02 AM | #271 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
I have a Tecpro 0.5s. This is a 2 element zoom-through wide-angle converter that unscrews in the middle. Once you've done this you're left with a +10 dioptre powerful close-up lens which can be used at full telepho for some quite oustanding closeups. Bit soft round the edges though, so best to shoot at smallish apertures (difficult on the TRV900 and HC1000 as neither allow it).
The front element can also be used as a partial zoom-through wide-angle converter, and it's WIDE - something like 0.4x, but with lots of barrel distortion. tom. |
June 22nd, 2006, 04:17 AM | #272 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: serbia
Posts: 50
|
pdx10, wide and filter...
well, I just bought x0.43 fish eye from COKIN for my pdx-10... my eternal dream, to have fish eye, at last, weeiii... :)
anyhow, I am considering to buy couple of filters (ND, polarizig, etc)... so, how can I attach both my wide adapter and filters on my camera? sorry for my ignorance, heh, but what things exactly do I need in order to achieve that? I am considering to order all that brom b&hphotovideo... thanx ... |
June 28th, 2006, 01:50 AM | #273 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
Does your fisheye lens vignette the corners of your image at the moment - in other words do you have 4 black corners when you use this lens?
If so, when you fit any filter between the lens and the camera's zoom this 'cut-off corners' effect will increase, so beware. I doubt if the 0.43x Cokin has a filter thread to accept filters or hoods up front, so you'll have to improvise with square filters (also sold by Cokin). The polarisor is a goodie but I wouldn't bother with extra ND. There's three of them built into the PDX10 already, and if it's incredibly bright I'd simply up the shutter speed a notch to soak an extra stop. Beware of going too far though as CCD smear quickly takes hold. tom. |
June 28th, 2006, 05:41 AM | #274 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: serbia
Posts: 50
|
well, this is image captured from camera... no zoom. vignette is out of safe frame, only can be seen on computer.
http://www.15minutespictures.com/beat/prdavaac.jpg weird, there is black vignette only on the right side... and, I took a photo of my camera, with cokin fisheye attached so you can see... http://www.15minutespictures.com/beat/kameraw.jpg so, u think there's no need for ND? okay... do you think some "sky" filters will be a goodie too? you know, sometimes, when adjusting exposure on subjects, to avoid overexposing sky, etc... or, what other filter do you recommend? |
June 28th, 2006, 06:46 AM | #275 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
All four corners are vignetted, but you're right in that the RHS is worse. Your lens is off axis with the centre of the chip - no big deal.
A graduated filter can be useful to control the over-exposure of the sky, but you have to be oh-so-careful when you use filters with a camera with such tiny 1/5" chips. If they're not spotless and well hooded you can get nasty flare and spots when you're using very short focal lengths. My recommendation? Don't use any filters unless you absolutely must. For dusty, sandy conditions and sticky-fingered children's parties, yes. But otherwise no. tom. |
August 8th, 2006, 08:31 AM | #276 |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 31
|
Switch from VX-2000 to PDX10?
Would I be crazy to replace my VX-2000 with a PDX10? My primary reason for considering the switch is size and weight. I'm getting to where I can't stand watching my hand held camera work with the VX-2000 anymore...not steady enough. The camera is so front-heavy, actually just heavy period for it's size. At work I use a DSR 300 and that heavier shoulder-mounted camera is easier to use hand held than the VX-2000.
I'd really like to get a glidecam to help with the stability issue, but I can't imagine how hard it would be to use for average to longth periods of time with a VX-2000. I assume a PDX10 would be more manageable. What will the trade off be between these two cameras as far as video degradation? How about low light sensitivity? Lense differences? If it matters, I acquired my VX-2000 in March '02. Any info you fine folks can share would be wonderful, I really enjoy this board.
__________________
Dan Eggleston - Panasonic AJ-PX800 / Panasonic AJ-PX270/Adobe CC on Mac Pro. http://www.youtube.com/pcctv1 |
September 19th, 2006, 08:33 AM | #277 |
Tourist
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
|
PC will not recognise PDX10
I've got a problem with my PDX10 camera. Today i wanted to capture some video, so i connected the camera with a firewire cable. Then this happends: on the LCD display of the camera appears "dv in" and that's it. In the capture window of Premiere, the only thing i see is: "Capture device offline".
Is this a known problem or is my camera broken? |
October 5th, 2006, 03:24 PM | #278 |
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardiff, UK
Posts: 223
|
An old question I know, but have you tried changing the firewire cable?
|
October 19th, 2006, 10:31 AM | #279 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
PDX-10 Picture jumping
Hi
Firstly, great to see forum for the PDX10. I've had mine for a couple of years and love it, however, on the last shoot the picture started jumping slightly to the left, then back to normal centre position and then left again etc etc I did find that if I turned it off and left it for a while, when I used it again, I could get about 10 mins before the same thing happened. I thought that I'd be able to fix it in the edit by adjusting the frames accordingly and then cropping but actually it seems that when it jumps left it also expands the vertical picture very slightly. This meant that although I could get the jump-left images centred, it still didn't sit correctly. Has anyone had eny experience of this and tell me what is wrong before I trudge off to the local repairshop? Thanks for any pointers. Dave |
October 19th, 2006, 12:42 PM | #280 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
Welcome to the group Dave. I've never seen anything like this on my PDX-10. I wonder if it might be related to the image stabilization system? Have you tried turning steadyshot off? Hard to tell from your description, but it might just be a drop-out problem of some kind on the tape also.
|
October 20th, 2006, 03:06 AM | #281 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Hi Boyd - thanks for the reply.
I was using it as a front-end for a stop-frame animation video so there was no film in the camera - I was literally grabbing stills via firewire to a Mac. (actually, the jumping effect didn't ruin the shoot and possibly added to the lo-fi flavour ;)) I first noticed the computer monitor jumping and re-booted, but then I noticed it was happening on the camera display so I changed the firewire cables etc but still the same thing occured. That's when I powered-down the PDX and noticed that I got the 10mins of normal use upon powering it up. I will, as you suggest, turn off the steadyshot and see if that helps. Thank you again Dave |
October 20th, 2006, 07:23 AM | #282 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Damn - sadly that didn't do the trick :(
On closer inspection though, it seems to be a kind of picture stretching, as opposed to jumping, and the right of the picture isn't affected at all. Very odd indeed. I think it's time for the menders :-/ Dave |
November 20th, 2006, 10:16 AM | #283 |
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 427
|
Hi Dave,
there is a web site here by sony europe in 2005 about faulty LCD screen problems on some pdx10p and pd170p . it gives all people a free repair on the stated serial number. I hope it helps this is the site: http://www.sony.co.uk/view/ShowArtic...site=odw_en_GB david |
November 20th, 2006, 11:00 AM | #284 |
Tourist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 4
|
Thanks very much for that David - for a moment there was a glimmer of hope :)
Sadly though, my serial number is higher than those. I might call the number on there though. You never know. Thanks again Dave |
November 20th, 2006, 11:20 AM | #285 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Mays Landing, NJ
Posts: 11,802
|
David: see my other post here: http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...d=1#post577133
The recall is not for LCD problems, but for CCD problems. |
| ||||||
|
|