|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
December 26th, 2003, 04:14 PM | #16 |
Wrangler
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 1,415
|
Tom, thanks for the info on the PDX10 and your explanation of how the latest cams spare some of the CCD for image stabilzation and high resolution 16:9. That makes a lot of sense.
BTW - I found this link on vibrating gyroscopes for image stabilzation (IS) and it sounds a lot like the IS on my Canon 28-135mm camera lens. Is this the same technology on the PDX10? http://www.canon.com/technology/deta...correct_shift/ |
December 27th, 2003, 11:03 AM | #17 |
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 4,711
|
I haven't visited the link yet, but yes - Canon's still camera lenses use the same vibrating element principle as Sony use with the 950. The system is working continuously, such that if you take a hand-held picture at 1/15th sec, say, then the OIS 'wipes' the image into the same spot on the film plane while the shutter's open. Ergo: less camera movement blur (but the same subject movement blur of course).
tom. |
| ||||||
|
|