NLOG 1.2 vs ELOG 1.0 Picture Profile test at DVinfo.net

Eric Aumen · March 13th, 2013, 12:48 PM

I wanted to share my test results with everyone here. I shared my test, stills, and video on my blog post here: Aumen Media ELOG 1.0 VS NLOG 1.2. I was very impressed Noah's new profile. Let me know what you think of the test results.

James Barbosa · March 14th, 2013, 11:28 AM

I like the way the noise when pushing the ISO up is more fine, closer to film grain and less video like. With Cinegamma 2 it makes a nice flat image.

This looks a good PP to use in lowlight conditions which is what I'm still looking for. A lot of the custom PP's I've seen are not meant for low light indoor settings like wedding receptions since they add a lot of noise with the higher ISO. Although, this one seems good unless someone knows a better option.

March 13th, 2013, 12:48 PM	#1
Eric Aumen Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: United States Posts: 37	NLOG 1.2 vs ELOG 1.0 Picture Profile test I wanted to share my test results with everyone here. I shared my test, stills, and video on my blog post here: Aumen Media ELOG 1.0 VS NLOG 1.2. I was very impressed Noah's new profile. Let me know what you think of the test results.

March 14th, 2013, 11:28 AM	#2
James Barbosa New Boot Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Mansfield, Ma Posts: 16	Re: NLOG 1.2 vs ELOG 1.0 Picture Profile test I like the way the noise when pushing the ISO up is more fine, closer to film grain and less video like. With Cinegamma 2 it makes a nice flat image. This looks a good PP to use in lowlight conditions which is what I'm still looking for. A lot of the custom PP's I've seen are not meant for low light indoor settings like wedding receptions since they add a lot of noise with the higher ISO. Although, this one seems good unless someone knows a better option.